Estradé Andrés, Spencer Tom John, De Micheli Andrea, Murguia-Asensio Silvia, Provenzani Umberto, McGuire Philip, Fusar-Poli Paolo
Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 3;13:945505. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.945505. eCollection 2022.
Indicated primary prevention of psychosis is recommended by NICE clinical guidelines, but implementation research on Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P) services is limited.
Electronic audit of CHR-P services in England, conducted between June and September 2021, addressing core implementation domains: service configuration, detection of at-risk individuals, prognostic assessment, clinical care, clinical research, and implementation challenges, complemented by comparative analyses across service model. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney -tests were employed.
Twenty-four CHR-P clinical services (19 cities) were included. Most (83.3%) services were integrated within other mental health services; only 16.7% were standalone. Across 21 services, total yearly caseload of CHR-P individuals was 693 (average: 33; range: 4-115). Most services (56.5%) accepted individuals aged 14-35; the majority (95.7%) utilized the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States (CAARMS). About 65% of services reported some provision of NICE-compliant interventions encompassing monitoring of mental state, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and family interventions. However, only 66.5 and 4.9% of CHR-P individuals actually received CBT and family interventions, respectively. Core implementation challenges included: recruitment of specialized professionals, lack of dedicated budget, and unmet training needs. Standalone services reported fewer implementation challenges, had larger caseloads ( = 0.047) and were more likely to engage with clinical research ( = 0.037) than integrated services.
While implementation of CHR-P services is observed in several parts of England, only standalone teams appear successful at detection of at-risk individuals. Compliance with NICE-prescribed interventions is limited across CHR-P services and unmet needs emerge for national training and investments.
英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)临床指南推荐对精神病进行指示性一级预防,但关于精神病临床高危(CHR-P)服务的实施研究有限。
2021年6月至9月对英格兰的CHR-P服务进行电子审计,涉及核心实施领域:服务配置、高危个体检测、预后评估、临床护理、临床研究和实施挑战,并通过跨服务模式的比较分析加以补充。采用描述性统计、费舍尔精确检验和曼-惠特尼检验。
纳入了24个CHR-P临床服务机构(19个城市)。大多数(83.3%)服务整合在其他心理健康服务中;只有16.7%是独立的。在21个服务机构中,CHR-P个体的年总病例数为693例(平均:33例;范围:4 - 115例)。大多数服务机构(56.5%)接收14至35岁的个体;大多数(95.7%)使用了高危精神状态综合评估(CAARMS)。约65%的服务机构报告提供了一些符合NICE规定的干预措施,包括精神状态监测、认知行为疗法(CBT)和家庭干预。然而,实际上只有66.5%的CHR-P个体接受了CBT,4.9%的个体接受了家庭干预。核心实施挑战包括:招聘专业人员、缺乏专用预算以及培训需求未得到满足。独立服务机构报告的实施挑战较少,病例数较多(P = 0.047),并且比整合服务机构更有可能参与临床研究(P = 0.037)。
虽然在英格兰的几个地区观察到CHR-P服务的实施情况,但只有独立团队在检测高危个体方面似乎取得了成功。CHR-P服务机构对NICE规定干预措施的依从性有限,国家培训和投资方面存在未满足的需求。