Ferrández Olivia, Urbina Olatz, Grau Santiago
Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nursing Department, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Universitari del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Dec 22;11:65-82. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S84667. eCollection 2017.
Tedizolid phosphate has high activity against the Gram-positive microorganisms mainly involved in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, such as strains of (including methicillin-resistant strains and methicillin-sensitive strains), , , the group, and , including those with some mechanism of resistance limiting the use of linezolid. The area under the curve for time 0-24 hours/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) pharmacodynamic ratio has shown the best correlation with the efficacy of tedizolid, versus the time above MIC ratio and the maximum drug concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio. Administration of this antibiotic for 6 days has shown its noninferiority versus administration of linezolid for 10 days in patients with skin and skin structure infections enrolled in two Phase III studies (ESTABLISH-1 and ESTABLISH-2). Tedizolid's more favorable safety profile and dosage regimen, which allow once-daily administration, versus linezolid, position it as a good therapeutic alternative. However, whether or not the greater economic cost associated with this antibiotic is offset by its shorter treatment duration and possibility of oral administration in routine clinical practice has yet to be clarified.
磷酸泰地唑胺对主要引起急性细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的革兰氏阳性微生物具有高活性,如金黄色葡萄球菌(包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌株)、化脓性链球菌、无乳链球菌、肠球菌属以及屎肠球菌,包括那些具有某些耐药机制限制利奈唑胺使用的菌株。0至24小时曲线下面积/最低抑菌浓度(MIC)药效学比值与泰地唑胺的疗效显示出最佳相关性,优于高于MIC比值和最大药物浓度/最低抑菌浓度比值。在两项III期研究(ESTABLISH - 1和ESTABLISH - 2)中,对于皮肤及皮肤结构感染患者,使用这种抗生素6天已显示出其不劣于使用利奈唑胺10天。与利奈唑胺相比,泰地唑胺更有利的安全性和给药方案(允许每日一次给药)使其成为一个良好的治疗选择。然而,在常规临床实践中,这种抗生素较高的经济成本是否会因其较短的治疗疗程和口服给药的可能性而得到抵消,仍有待阐明。