健康的社会决定因素：研究癌症健康差异及少数群体参与研究的框架
Social Determinants of Health: A Framework for Studying Cancer Health Disparities and Minority Participation in Research.
作者信息
Asare Matthew, Flannery Marie, Kamen Charles
出版信息
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jan 2;44(1):20-23. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.20-23.
Abstract
The theory of social determinants of health (SDH) posits that the health of people and communities is affected by social and economic factors (i.e., economic stability, education, neighborhood and built environment, health and health care, and social and community context). These interrelated constructs may negatively affect minority patients’ ability to participate in cancer research. Understanding SDH can help nurse researchers assess and address barriers to research participation, as well as design trials to improve minority patients’ cancer-related health.
摘要
健康的社会决定因素（SDH）理论认为，个人和社区的健康受到社会和经济因素（即经济稳定性、教育、社区及建成环境、健康与医疗保健，以及社会和社区背景）的影响。这些相互关联的因素可能会对少数族裔患者参与癌症研究的能力产生负面影响。了解健康的社会决定因素有助于护理研究人员评估并解决研究参与的障碍，以及设计试验以改善少数族裔患者与癌症相关的健康状况。
相似文献
1
Social Determinants of Health: A Framework for Studying Cancer Health Disparities and Minority Participation in Research.健康的社会决定因素：研究癌症健康差异及少数群体参与研究的框架
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jan 2;44(1):20-23. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.20-23.
2
Increasing minority patient participation in cancer clinical trials using oncology nurse navigation.利用肿瘤护士导航增加少数族裔患者参与癌症临床试验。
Am J Surg. 2012 Apr;203(4):415-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
3
HIV/AIDS: a minority health issue.艾滋病毒/艾滋病：一个少数群体的健康问题。
Med Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;89(4):895-912. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2005.03.005.
4
Faculty analysis of distributed medical education in Northern Canadian Aboriginal communities.加拿大北部原住民社区分布式医学教育的教员分析
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(4):2664. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
5
Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health care.界定文化能力：解决健康及医疗保健领域种族/族裔差异问题的实用框架。
Public Health Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug;118(4):293-302. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.4.293.
6
Changing health outcomes of vulnerable populations through nursing's influence on neighborhood built environment: a framework for nursing research.通过护理对社区建筑环境的影响改变弱势群体的健康结果：护理研究框架。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012 Dec;44(4):341-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01470.x. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
7
Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities.日常参与的环境障碍与支持：来自残疾人的质性内部视角
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4):578-88. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.008.
8
Special Populations Networks--how this innovative community-based initiative affected minority and underserved research programs.特殊人群网络——这项基于社区的创新举措如何影响少数群体和服务不足人群的研究项目。
Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8 Suppl):1939-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22164.
9
American society of clinical oncology policy statement: disparities in cancer care.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明：癌症治疗中的差异
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2881-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1680. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
10
Using community-based participatory research to explore social determinants of women's mental health and barriers to help-seeking in three urban, ethnically diverse, impoverished, and underserved communities.利用基于社区的参与性研究，探索三个城市、种族多样、贫困且服务不足社区中女性心理健康的社会决定因素及寻求帮助的障碍。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2013 Dec;27(6):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
引用本文的文献
1
Online46: Online cognitive assessments in elderly cohorts-The British 1946 birth cohort case study.在线46：老年人群体中的在线认知评估——以英国1946年出生队列为例的案例研究。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2025 Jun 9;17(2):e70098. doi: 10.1002/dad2.70098. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
You've got mail: comparing individuals who do and do not provide DNA saliva samples by mail in a study of severe alcohol use disorder.您收到邮件：在一项关于严重酒精使用障碍的研究中，比较通过邮件提供和不提供DNA唾液样本的个体。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2025 May 14;60(4). doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaf028.
3
Breast and cervical cancer screening among women at reproductive age in Cambodia: A secondary analysis of Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2022.柬埔寨育龄妇女的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查：对《2022年柬埔寨人口与健康调查》的二次分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0295881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295881. eCollection 2025.
4
Equity in cancer care: mixed methods clinical utility analysis of the Nursing Equity Assessment Tool (NEAT) to identify disadvantage in newly diagnosed cancer patients.癌症护理中的公平性：护理公平性评估工具（NEAT）的混合方法临床效用分析，以识别新诊断癌症患者的不利因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Dec 30;33(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09094-x.
5
Contextualising and challenging under-representation in research in light of Cultural Trauma: a qualitative focus group and interview study.从文化创伤角度审视并质疑研究中代表性不足的问题：一项定性焦点小组和访谈研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jul 2;10(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00600-3.
6
Social determinants of health inequalities in early phase clinical trials in Northern England.英格兰北部早期临床试验中健康不平等的社会决定因素。
Br J Cancer. 2024 Sep;131(4):685-691. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02765-w. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
7
Quality of antenatal care and outcomes of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy among antenatal attendees: A comparison of urban and periurban health facilities in Ghana.产前护理质量与妊娠高血压疾病结局：加纳城乡保健机构比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 1;18(12):e0294327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294327. eCollection 2023.
8
Social determinants of health and lung cancer surgery: a qualitative study.健康的社会决定因素与肺癌手术：一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 31;11:1285419. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1285419. eCollection 2023.
9
The Impact and Opportunity of Inclusive Excellence: Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Cancer Clinical Trials.包容性卓越的影响与机遇：在癌症临床试验中解决健康的社会决定因素
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8036-8043. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14288-4. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
10
Social determinants of health, psychological distress, and caregiver burden among informal cancer caregivers of cancer survivors during treatment.癌症患者治疗期间，癌症幸存者非正式照护者的健康社会决定因素、心理困扰和照护者负担。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2024;42(3):333-350. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2023.2248486. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据，2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
2
The impact of socioeconomic status on access to cancer clinical trials.社会经济地位对参与癌症临床试验的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Oct 28;111(9):1684-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.108. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
3
Effect of socioeconomic status as measured by education level on survival in breast cancer clinical trials.受教育程度衡量的社会经济地位对乳腺癌临床试验生存的影响。
Psychooncology. 2013 Feb;22(2):315-23. doi: 10.1002/pon.2094. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
4
Recruitment of African Americans to National Oncology Clinical Trials through a clinical trial shared resource.通过临床试验共享资源招募非裔美国人参与国家肿瘤学临床试验。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Feb;21(1 Suppl):38-50. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0251.
5
Race, race-based discrimination, and health outcomes among African Americans.非裔美国人的种族、基于种族的歧视与健康状况
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:201-25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190212.
6
Enrollment of African Americans onto clinical treatment trials: study design barriers.非裔美国人参与临床治疗试验：研究设计障碍
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 15;22(4):730-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.160.
7
A nurse's primer on recruiting participants for clinical trials.护士招募临床试验参与者入门指南。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002 Aug;29(7):1091-8. doi: 10.1188/02.ONF.1091-1098.
8
Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies.影响参与医学研究意愿的因素中的种族差异。
Ann Epidemiol. 2002 May;12(4):248-56. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00265-4.
9
Primary care physicians' attitudes, knowledge, and practices related to cancer clinical trials.基层医疗医生与癌症临床试验相关的态度、知识和实践。
J Cancer Educ. 2001 Winter;16(4):188-92. doi: 10.1080/08858190109528771.
Zotero 插件