van Waes P F, Feldberg M A, Barth P
Department of Radiology, Utrecht University Hospital, The Netherlands.
Eur J Radiol. 1989 Aug;9(3):179-81.
Palatability as well as the side effects and computed tomographic image quality associated with the oral use of Telebrix Gastro (ioxithalamate) and Gastrografin (amidotrizoate) in bowel opacification were compared in a double-blind study involving 100 patients in a 24-hour protocol. There was a tendency (p = 0.07) for Telebrix Gastro to show greater palatability. The difference between the 2 groups in terms of patient discomfort was too small to reach statistical significance (p less than 0.09). There was no statistical difference between the agents with respect to image quality. In 87% of cases in both groups bowel filling was adequate.
在一项双盲研究中,对100名患者采用24小时方案,比较了口服Telebrix Gastro(碘酞葡胺)和泛影葡胺(泛影酸盐)进行肠道造影时的适口性、副作用以及计算机断层扫描图像质量。Telebrix Gastro有显示出更高适口性的趋势(p = 0.07)。两组在患者不适方面的差异过小,未达到统计学显著性(p小于0.09)。两种药物在图像质量方面无统计学差异。两组中87%的病例肠道充盈良好。