Lee Hopin, Hübscher Markus, Moseley G Lorimer, Kamper Steven J, Traeger Adrian C, Skinner Ian W, Williams Christopher M, McAuley James H
1 Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, NSW, Australia.
2 Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):162-169. doi: 10.1177/1740774516683921. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
Marketing communication and brand identity is a fundamental principle of advertising and end-user engagement. Health researchers have begun to apply this principle to trial recruitment in primary care. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a Teaser Campaign using a series of postcards in advance of a conventional mail-out increases the number of primary care clinics that engage with a clinical trial.
Embedded randomised recruitment trial across primary care clinics (general practitioners and physiotherapists) in the Sydney metropolitan area. Clinics in the Teaser Campaign group received a series of branded promotional postcards in advance of a standard letter inviting them to participate in a clinical trial. Clinics in the Standard Mail group did not receive the postcards.
From a total of 744 clinics that were sent an invitation letter, 46 clinics in the Teaser Campaign group and 40 clinics in the Standard Mail group responded (11.6% total response rate). There was no between-group difference in the odds of responding to the invitation letter (odds ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval = 0.75-1.85, p = 0.49). For physiotherapy clinics and general practice clinics, the odds ratios were 1.43 (confidence interval = 0.82-2.48, p = 0.21) and 0.77 (confidence interval = 0.34-1.75, p = 0.54), respectively.
A Teaser Campaign using a series of branded promotional postcards did not improve clinic engagement for a randomised controlled trial in primary care.
营销传播和品牌形象是广告及终端用户参与的一项基本原则。健康研究人员已开始将这一原则应用于初级保健中的试验招募。本研究的目的是评估在常规邮件发送之前使用一系列明信片进行的预热活动是否会增加参与一项临床试验的初级保健诊所的数量。
在悉尼大都市地区的初级保健诊所(全科医生和物理治疗师)中进行嵌入式随机招募试验。预热活动组的诊所在收到邀请其参与一项临床试验的标准信件之前,先收到了一系列带有品牌的宣传明信片。标准邮件组的诊所未收到明信片。
在总共744家收到邀请信的诊所中,预热活动组有46家诊所做出回应,标准邮件组有40家诊所做出回应(总回应率为11.6%)。两组对邀请信做出回应的几率没有差异(优势比=1.18,95%置信区间=0.75-1.85,p=0.49)。对于物理治疗诊所和全科诊所,优势比分别为1.43(置信区间=0.82-2.48,p=0.21)和0.77(置信区间=0.34-1.75,p=0.54)。
使用一系列带有品牌的宣传明信片进行的预热活动,并未提高初级保健中一项随机对照试验的诊所参与度。