Kahle Jason T, Highsmith M Jason, Schaepper Hans, Johannesson Anton, Orendurff Michael S, Kaufman Kenton
OP Solutions, Tampa, FL, USA; Prosthetic Design + Research, Tampa, FL, USA.
School of Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Extremity Trauma & Amputation Center of Excellence (EACE), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Tampa, FL, USA; 319 Minimal Care Detachment, U.S. Army Reserves, Pinellas Park, FL, USA.
Technol Innov. 2016 Sep;18(2-3):125-137. doi: 10.21300/18.2-3.2016.125. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
There is not a clear clinical recommendation for the determination of prosthetic candidacy. Guidelines do not delineate which member(s) of the multidisciplinary team are responsible for prosthetic candidacy decisions and which factors will best predict a positive outcome. Also not clearly addressed is a patient-centered decision-making role. In a previous systematic review (SR), Sansam et al. reported on the prediction of walking ability following lower limb amputation using literature up to 2007. The search strategy was designed from the previous Sansam SR as an update of previously valuable predictive factors of prosthetic candidacy. An electronic literature search was executed from August 8, 2007, to December 31, 2015, using MEDLINE (Pubmed), Embase, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (Ovid), and Cochrane. A total of 319 studies were identified through the electronic search. Of these, 298 were eliminated, leaving a total of 21 for full evaluation. Conclusions from this updated study are drawn from a total recruited sample () of 15,207 subjects. A total of 12,410 subjects completed the respective studies (18% attrition). This updated study increases the size of the original Sansam et al. report by including 137% more subjects for a total of 21,490 between the two articles Etiology, physical fitness, pre-amputation living status, amputation level, age, physical fitness, and comorbidities are included as moderate to strongly supported predictive factors of prosthetic candidacy. These factors are supported in an earlier literature review and should be strongly considered in a complete history and physical examination by a multidisciplinary team. Predictive factors should be part of the patient's healthcare record.
关于确定假体植入候选资格,目前尚无明确的临床建议。指南未明确多学科团队中的哪些成员负责假体植入候选资格的决策,也未明确哪些因素能最佳预测积极结果。同样未明确的是以患者为中心的决策作用。在之前的一项系统评价(SR)中,桑萨姆等人利用截至2007年的文献报道了下肢截肢后步行能力的预测情况。检索策略是在之前桑萨姆系统评价的基础上设计的,作为对先前有价值的假体植入候选资格预测因素的更新。于2007年8月8日至2015年12月31日使用医学主题词表(PubMed)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引数据库(CINAHL)(Ovid)和考科蓝图书馆进行电子文献检索。通过电子检索共识别出319项研究。其中,298项被排除,最终共有21项进行全面评估。这项更新研究的结论来自总共招募的15207名受试者的样本。共有12410名受试者完成了各自的研究(损耗率为18%)。这项更新研究增加了原桑萨姆等人报告的样本量,两篇文章共纳入了比原样本多137%的受试者,共计21490名。病因、身体健康状况、截肢前生活状态、截肢水平、年龄、身体健康状况和合并症被列为假体植入候选资格的中度至强支持预测因素。这些因素在早期的文献综述中得到了支持,多学科团队在完整的病史和体格检查中应予以充分考虑。预测因素应成为患者医疗记录的一部分。