Davidson B R, Sams V R, Styles J, Dean C, Boulos P B
Department of Surgery, University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, London.
Gut. 1989 Sep;30(9):1260-5. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.9.1260.
The heterogeneous nature of tumour antigen expression may require selection of monoclonal antibodies on an individual patient or tumour basis to allow adequate tumour localisation. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) expression has not previously been compared in colorectal cancer patients. Sections of cancer (n = 52), adjacent normal colon (n = 45), synchronous adenomas (n = 11) and nodal metastases (n = 49) were examined by indirect immunoperoxidase staining in 51 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer using monoclonal antibodies to CEA and EMA. The percentage of cells with positive staining in the primary tumours was graded 1: less than 25%, 2: 25-49%, 3: 50-75%, 4 greater than 75%. All primary colorectal cancers expressed CEA and 43 of 52 expressed EMA (83%). Grading showed CEA greater than EMA in 39, equal in 11 and less in two. Well differentiated cancers were more frequently graded three or four for CEA staining (23 of 27) than moderately differentiated cancers (11 of 22) (p less than 0.01). Equivalent figures for EMA were four of 27 and three of 22 (not significant) (NS) although the majority (86%) were graded 1 and 2. Grade 1 CEA expression was found in six of 15 proximal and only two of 37 distal lesions (p less than 0.01, chi 2 test) while for EMA equivalent figures were three of 15 and six of 37 (NS). Nodal deposits all expressed CEA and 45 of 49 expressed EMA (92%); 29 of 45 normal colon sections showed CEA expression (64%) as did all adenomas. EMA was not expressed by normal colon or adenomas. These results suggest that EMA expression is more specific but less sensitive than CEA for colonic cancer and is independent of tumour differentiation and site. Thus selecting monoclonal antibodies to CEA or EMA based on tumour biopsies may allow improved tumour localisation for imaging or therapy in patents with colorectal cancer.
肿瘤抗原表达的异质性可能需要根据个体患者或肿瘤情况选择单克隆抗体,以实现充分的肿瘤定位。此前尚未对结直肠癌患者的癌胚抗原(CEA)和上皮膜抗原(EMA)表达情况进行比较。使用抗CEA和EMA的单克隆抗体,通过间接免疫过氧化物酶染色法,对51例连续的结直肠癌患者的癌组织切片(n = 52)、相邻正常结肠组织切片(n = 45)、同期腺瘤组织切片(n = 11)和淋巴结转移灶组织切片(n = 49)进行了检查。对原发性肿瘤中染色阳性细胞的百分比进行分级:1级:小于25%;2级:25% - 49%;3级:50% - 75%;4级:大于75%。所有原发性结直肠癌均表达CEA,52例中有43例表达EMA(83%)。分级显示,CEA表达高于EMA的有39例,二者相等的有11例,低于EMA的有2例。高分化癌的CEA染色分级为三级或四级的频率(27例中的23例)高于中分化癌(22例中的11例)(p < 0.01)。EMA的相应数字为27例中的4例和22例中的3例(无显著性差异)(NS),尽管大多数(86%)为1级和2级。在15例近端病变中有6例出现1级CEA表达,而在37例远端病变中只有2例(p < 0. / 01,卡方检验);EMA的相应数字为15例中的3例和37例中的6例(无显著性差异)。淋巴结转移灶均表达CEA,49例中有45例表达EMA(92%);45例正常结肠组织切片中有29例显示CEA表达(64%),所有腺瘤也均表达CEA。正常结肠组织和腺瘤均不表达EMA。这些结果表明,对于结肠癌,EMA表达更具特异性,但敏感性低于CEA,且与肿瘤分化和部位无关。因此,根据肿瘤活检结果选择抗CEA或抗EMA单克隆抗体,可能会改善结直肠癌患者成像或治疗中的肿瘤定位。