Shemilt Ian, Hendry Vivien, Marteau Theresa M
Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 12;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3956-2.
Explicit labelling of lower strength alcohol products could reduce alcohol consumption by attracting more people to buy and drink such products instead of higher strength ones. Alternatively, it may lead to more consumption due to a 'self-licensing' mechanism. Equivalent labelling of food or tobacco (for example "Low fat" or "Low tar") could influence consumption of those products by similar mechanisms. This systematic review examined the effects of 'Low alcohol' and equivalent labelling of alcohol, food and tobacco products on selection, consumption, and perceptions of products among adults.
A systematic review was conducted based on Cochrane methods. Electronic and snowball searches identified 26 eligible studies. Evidence from 12 randomised controlled trials (all on food) was assessed for risk of bias, synthesised using random effects meta-analysis, and interpreted in conjunction with evidence from 14 non-randomised studies (one on alcohol, seven on food and six on tobacco). Outcomes assessed were: quantities of the product (i) selected or (ii) consumed (primary outcomes - behaviours), (iii) intentions to select or consume the product, (iv) beliefs associated with it consumption, (v) product appeal, and (vi) understanding of the label (secondary outcomes - cognitions).
Evidence for impacts on the primary outcomes (i.e. amounts selected or consumed) was overall of very low quality, showing mixed effects, likely to vary by specific label descriptors, products and population characteristics. Overall very low quality evidence suggested that exposure to 'Low alcohol' and equivalent labelling on alcohol, food and tobacco products can shift consumer perceptions of products, with the potential to 'self-licence' excess consumption.
Considerable uncertainty remains about the effects of labels denoting low alcohol, and equivalent labels, on alcohol, food and tobacco selection and consumption. Independent, high-quality studies are urgently needed to inform policies on labelling regulations.
对低酒精度产品进行明确标注,可能会吸引更多人购买和饮用此类产品而非高酒精度产品,从而减少酒精消费。或者,由于“自我许可”机制,这可能导致更多的消费。食品或烟草的等效标签(例如“低脂”或“低焦油”)可能通过类似机制影响这些产品的消费。本系统评价考察了“低酒精”以及酒精、食品和烟草产品的等效标签对成年人产品选择、消费及产品认知的影响。
基于Cochrane方法进行系统评价。通过电子检索和滚雪球检索确定了26项符合条件的研究。对12项随机对照试验(均针对食品)的证据进行偏倚风险评估,采用随机效应荟萃分析进行综合,并结合14项非随机研究(1项针对酒精,7项针对食品,6项针对烟草)的证据进行解读。评估的结局包括:(i)选择的产品数量或(ii)消费的产品数量(主要结局——行为),(iii)选择或消费该产品的意图,(iv)与消费相关的信念,(v)产品吸引力,以及(vi)对标签的理解(次要结局——认知)。
关于对主要结局(即选择或消费的数量)影响的证据总体质量极低,显示出混合效应,可能因具体的标签描述、产品和人群特征而异。总体质量极低的证据表明,接触酒精、食品和烟草产品上的“低酒精”及等效标签会改变消费者对产品的认知,有可能“自我许可”过度消费。
对于表示低酒精的标签以及等效标签对酒精、食品和烟草选择及消费的影响,仍存在相当大的不确定性。迫切需要开展独立的高质量研究,为标签法规政策提供依据。