Pepe Murad, Kocadal Onur, Iyigun Abdullah, Gunes Zafer, Aksahin Ertugrul, Aktekin Cem Nuri
Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Mar;51(2):146-149. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.12.006. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
The aim of our study was to develop a smartphone-aided end vertebra selection method and to investigate its effectiveness in Cobb angle measurement.
Twenty-nine adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients' pre-operative posteroanterior scoliosis radiographs were used for end vertebra selection and Cobb angle measurement by standard method and smartphone-aided method. Measurements were performed by 7 examiners. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to analyze selection and measurement reliability. Summary statistics of variance calculations were used to provide 95% prediction limits for the error in Cobb angle measurements. A paired 2-tailed t test was used to analyze end vertebra selection differences.
Mean absolute Cobb angle difference was 3.6° for the manual method and 1.9° for the smartphone-aided method. Both intraobserver and interobserver reliability were found excellent in manual and smartphone set for Cobb angle measurement. Both intraobserver and interobserver reliability were found excellent in manual and smartphone set for end vertebra selection. But reliability values of manual set were lower than smartphone. Two observers selected significantly different end vertebra in their repeated selections for manual method.
Smartphone-aided method for end vertebra selection and Cobb angle measurement showed excellent reliability. We can expect a reduction in measurement error rates with the widespread use of this method in clinical practice.
Level III, Diagnostic study.
本研究旨在开发一种智能手机辅助的终椎选择方法,并研究其在测量Cobb角方面的有效性。
使用29例青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者术前的脊柱后前位X线片,通过标准方法和智能手机辅助方法进行终椎选择和Cobb角测量。测量由7名检查者进行。组内相关系数用于分析选择和测量的可靠性。方差计算的汇总统计用于提供Cobb角测量误差的95%预测限。采用配对双尾t检验分析终椎选择差异。
手动方法的平均绝对Cobb角差异为3.6°,智能手机辅助方法为1.9°。在手动和智能手机设置中,观察者内和观察者间在测量Cobb角方面的可靠性均极佳。在手动和智能手机设置中,观察者内和观察者间在选择终椎方面的可靠性也均极佳。但手动设置的可靠性值低于智能手机。两名观察者在重复使用手动方法进行选择时,选择的终椎存在显著差异。
智能手机辅助的终椎选择和Cobb角测量方法显示出极佳的可靠性。随着该方法在临床实践中的广泛应用,我们有望降低测量误差率。
III级,诊断性研究。