Wong Riff Karen W Y, Tsangaris Elena, Goodacre Tim, Forrest Christopher R, Pusic Andrea L, Cano Stefan J, Klassen Anne F
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 11;7(1):e015467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015467.
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments should be developed according to rigorous guidelines in order to provide clinically meaningful, scientifically sound measurement. Understanding the methodology behind instrument development informs the selection of the most appropriate tool. This mixed methods protocol describes the development of an internationally applicable PRO instrument, the CLEFT-Q, for evaluating outcomes of treatment for cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).
The study includes three main phases that occur iteratively and interactively. In phase I, we determine what concepts are important to patients regarding their outcome. A conceptual framework for the CLEFT-Q is formed through a systematic review and an extensive international qualitative study. The systematic review ascertains what concepts have previously been measured in patients with CL/P. The qualitative study employs interpretive description and involves in-depth interviews with patients in high-income and lower-middle income countries. Preliminary items are generated from the qualitative data. Preliminary scales are then created for each theme in the framework. Cognitive debriefing interviews and expert clinician input are used to refine the scales in an iterative process. In phase II, the preliminary scales are administered to a large international group of patients with CL/P. The modern psychometric method of Rasch Measurement Theory analysis is employed to define the measurement characteristics. The preliminary scales are shortened based on these results. In phase III, further tests assess reliability, validity and responsiveness of the instrument.
The study is approved by Research Ethics Boards for each participating site. Findings from this study will be published in open access peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. Integrated knowledge translation is employed to engage stakeholders from the outset of the study. Successful execution of the CLEFT-Q will result in an internationally applicable PRO instrument for children and young adults with CL/P.
患者报告结局(PRO)工具应根据严格的指南进行开发,以提供具有临床意义、科学合理的测量。了解工具开发背后的方法有助于选择最合适的工具。本混合方法方案描述了一种国际适用的PRO工具——唇腭裂结局问卷(CLEFT-Q)的开发,用于评估唇裂和/或腭裂(CL/P)治疗的结局。
该研究包括三个主要阶段,这些阶段以迭代和交互的方式进行。在第一阶段,我们确定哪些概念对患者的结局很重要。通过系统综述和广泛的国际定性研究形成CLEFT-Q的概念框架。系统综述确定先前在CL/P患者中测量过哪些概念。定性研究采用解释性描述,涉及对高收入和中低收入国家患者的深入访谈。从定性数据中生成初步条目。然后为框架中的每个主题创建初步量表。认知反馈访谈和专家临床医生的意见用于在迭代过程中完善量表。在第二阶段,将初步量表施用于一大组国际CL/P患者。采用现代心理测量方法——拉施测量理论分析来定义测量特征。根据这些结果缩短初步量表。在第三阶段,进一步测试评估该工具的信度、效度和反应度。
该研究已获得每个参与地点的研究伦理委员会批准。本研究的结果将发表在开放获取的同行评审期刊上,并在国内和国际会议上展示。从研究一开始就采用综合知识转化方法让利益相关者参与进来。成功实施CLEFT-Q将产生一种适用于CL/P儿童和青少年的国际适用PRO工具。