• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阑尾炎的经济学:1998 年至 2008 年腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的成本趋势分析。

Economics of appendicitis: cost trend analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy from 1998 to 2008.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, York Hospital, WellSpan Health, York, Pennsylvania 17403, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2011 Dec;171(2):e161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.067. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.067
PMID:21962815
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has become more acceptable for the treatment of appendicitis over the last decade; however, its cost benefit compared to open appendectomy (OA) remains under debate. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utilization of LA and its cost effectiveness based on total hospital charges stratified by complexity of disease and complications compared to OA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nationwide Inpatient Sample data from 1998 to 2008 with the principal diagnosis of appendicitis were included. Appendicitis cases were divided by simple and complex (peritonitis or abscess) and subdivided by OA, LA, and lap converted to open (CONV). Total charges (2008 value), length of stay (LOS), and complications were assessed by disease presentation and operative approach.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2008, 1,561,518 (54.3%) OA, 1,231,643 (42.8%) LA, and 84,662 (2.9%) CONV appendectomies were performed. LA had shorter LOS (2 d) than OA (3 d) and CONV (5 d) (P<0.001). CONV (7.4%) cases had more complications than OA (3.7%) and LA (2.6%). LA ($19,978) and CONV ($28,103) are costlier than OA ($15,714) based on normalized cost for simple and complex diseases (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LA is more prevalent but its cost is higher in both simple and complex cases. Cost and complications increase if the case is converted to open. OA remains the most cost effective approach for patients with acute appendicitis.

摘要

背景

在过去的十年中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)已越来越被接受用于治疗阑尾炎;然而,与开腹阑尾切除术(OA)相比,其成本效益仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估根据疾病复杂性和并发症的总住院费用,与 OA 相比,LA 的利用情况及其成本效益。

材料和方法

纳入了 1998 年至 2008 年全国住院患者样本中主要诊断为阑尾炎的患者。根据单纯性和复杂性(腹膜炎或脓肿)以及 OA、LA 和转为开腹(CONV)将阑尾炎病例进行分类。通过疾病表现和手术方式评估总费用(2008 年价值)、住院时间(LOS)和并发症。

结果

1998 年至 2008 年间,行 OA 切除术 1561518 例(54.3%),LA 切除术 1231643 例(42.8%),CONV 切除术 84662 例(2.9%)。LA 的 LOS(2 天)短于 OA(3 天)和 CONV(5 天)(P<0.001)。CONV(7.4%)病例的并发症多于 OA(3.7%)和 LA(2.6%)。基于简单和复杂疾病的归一化成本,LA(19978 美元)和 CONV(28103 美元)比 OA(15714 美元)更昂贵(P<0.001)。

结论

LA 在简单和复杂病例中更为普遍,但成本更高。如果病例转为开腹,成本和并发症会增加。OA 仍然是治疗急性阑尾炎最具成本效益的方法。

相似文献

1
Economics of appendicitis: cost trend analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy from 1998 to 2008.阑尾炎的经济学:1998 年至 2008 年腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的成本趋势分析。
J Surg Res. 2011 Dec;171(2):e161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.067. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
2
Laparoscopic appendectomy--is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005.腹腔镜阑尾切除术——是否物有所值?2000年至2005年美国的趋势分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):179-85.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.026.
3
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
4
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:以色列一家医院的回顾性比较结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4.
5
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.儿童复杂性阑尾炎:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是否合适?与开腹阑尾切除术的比较研究——我们的经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037.
6
Cost of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.开腹与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的费用
Clin Ter. 2008 May-Jun;159(3):155-63.
7
Can we afford to do laparoscopic appendectomy in an academic hospital?在一家学术医院,我们有能力开展腹腔镜阑尾切除术吗?
Am J Surg. 2005 Dec;190(6):950-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.08.026.
8
Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822aa8ea.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗肥胖人群急性非穿孔与穿孔阑尾炎的比较。
Am J Surg. 2011 Dec;202(6):733-8; discussion 738-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.06.034. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
10
Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.老年患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的优势。
Am Surg. 2006 Jun;72(6):474-80.

引用本文的文献

1
Clear Vision, Clear Savings: Enhancing Efficiency in Minimally Invasive Surgery.清晰视野,显著节省:提高微创手术效率
JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00023. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
2
The use of the extracorporeally prepared hand-made endo-loop technique in laparoscopic appendectomy.经体外制备的手工内套圈技术在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的应用。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 May;29(5):613-617. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.86650.
3
Comparison of outcomes and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic and open appendectomies in public health services.
腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术在公共卫生服务中的结局和成本效益比较。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2021 Oct 11;48:e20213010. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20213010. eCollection 2021.
4
Disease burden of appendectomy for appendicitis: a population-based cohort study.阑尾炎切除手术的疾病负担:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):116-125. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06738-6. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
5
Mini-Incision Open Appendectomy with Incision Skin Tissue Retractor vs. Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Retrospective Study of the Management of Child Acute Appendicitis.小切口开腹阑尾切除术联合切口皮肤组织牵开器与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗小儿急性阑尾炎的回顾性研究。
Adv Ther. 2018 Dec;35(12):2176-2185. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0829-3. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Acute Appendicitis after Liver Transplantation: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.肝移植术后急性阑尾炎:一例病例报告及文献综述
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2017;8(4):208-212. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
7
A Population-Based Cohort Study of Emergency Appendectomy Performed in England and New York State.一项基于人群的关于在英格兰和纽约州实施急诊阑尾切除术的队列研究。
World J Surg. 2017 Aug;41(8):1975-1984. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3981-z.
8
Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic appendectomy: a Markov model.预防性阑尾切除术的成本效益:一个马尔可夫模型。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3596-3604. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5391-y. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
9
Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy.腹腔镜与小切口开放性阑尾切除术
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct 27;7(10):267-72. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i10.267.
10
Laparoscopic Appendectomy versus Mini-Incision Appendectomy in Patients with Lower Body Mass Index and Noncomplicated Appendicitis.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与小切口阑尾切除术治疗下半身质量指数和非复杂性阑尾炎患者。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:138648. doi: 10.1155/2014/138648. Epub 2014 Dec 14.