Suppr超能文献

学术风气与不当署名:谁想要它,为何想要?

Culture and Unmerited Authorship Credit: Who Wants It and Why?

作者信息

Ren Xiaopeng, Su Hong, Lu Kewen, Dong Xiawei, Ouyang Zhengzheng, Talhelm Thomas

机构信息

CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology Beijing, China.

CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of PsychologyBeijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 27;7:2017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02017. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Unmerited authorship is a practice common to many countries around the world, but are there systematic cultural differences in the practice? We tested whether scientists from collectivistic countries are more likely to add unmerited coauthors than scientists from individualistic countries. We analyzed archival data from top scientific journals (Study 1) and found that national collectivism predicted the number of authors, which might suggest more unmerited authors. Next, we found that collectivistic scientists were more likely to add unmerited coauthors than individualistic scientists, both between cultures (Studies 2-3) and within cultures (Study 4). Finally, we found that priming people with collectivistic self-construal primes made them more likely to endorse questionable authorship attitudes (Study 5). These findings show that culture collectivism is related to unmerited authorship.

摘要

不当署名是世界上许多国家都存在的一种普遍现象,但在这种行为上是否存在系统性的文化差异呢?我们测试了来自集体主义国家的科学家是否比来自个人主义国家的科学家更有可能添加不当共同作者。我们分析了顶级科学期刊的档案数据(研究1),发现国家集体主义预示了作者数量,这可能意味着存在更多不当作者。接下来,我们发现,无论是在不同文化之间(研究2 - 3)还是在同一文化内部(研究4),集体主义科学家比个人主义科学家更有可能添加不当共同作者。最后,我们发现用集体主义自我建构启动语引导人们会使他们更有可能认可有问题的署名态度(研究5)。这些发现表明文化集体主义与不当署名有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336e/5186795/33347eaf663d/fpsyg-07-02017-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验