Ren Xiaopeng, Su Hong, Lu Kewen, Dong Xiawei, Ouyang Zhengzheng, Talhelm Thomas
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology Beijing, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of PsychologyBeijing, China; University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijing, China.
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 27;7:2017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02017. eCollection 2016.
Unmerited authorship is a practice common to many countries around the world, but are there systematic cultural differences in the practice? We tested whether scientists from collectivistic countries are more likely to add unmerited coauthors than scientists from individualistic countries. We analyzed archival data from top scientific journals (Study 1) and found that national collectivism predicted the number of authors, which might suggest more unmerited authors. Next, we found that collectivistic scientists were more likely to add unmerited coauthors than individualistic scientists, both between cultures (Studies 2-3) and within cultures (Study 4). Finally, we found that priming people with collectivistic self-construal primes made them more likely to endorse questionable authorship attitudes (Study 5). These findings show that culture collectivism is related to unmerited authorship.
不当署名是世界上许多国家都存在的一种普遍现象,但在这种行为上是否存在系统性的文化差异呢?我们测试了来自集体主义国家的科学家是否比来自个人主义国家的科学家更有可能添加不当共同作者。我们分析了顶级科学期刊的档案数据(研究1),发现国家集体主义预示了作者数量,这可能意味着存在更多不当作者。接下来,我们发现,无论是在不同文化之间(研究2 - 3)还是在同一文化内部(研究4),集体主义科学家比个人主义科学家更有可能添加不当共同作者。最后,我们发现用集体主义自我建构启动语引导人们会使他们更有可能认可有问题的署名态度(研究5)。这些发现表明文化集体主义与不当署名有关。