Stecher Brian M, Camm Frank, Damberg Cheryl L, Hamilton Laura S, Mullen Kathleen J, Nelson Christopher, Sorensen Paul, Wachs Martin, Yoh Allison, Zellman Gail L, Leuschner Kristin J, Camm Frank, Stecher Brian M
Rand Health Q. 2012 Mar 1;2(1):5. eCollection 2012 Spring.
Performance-based accountability systems (PBASs), which link incentives to measured performance as a means of improving services to the public, have gained popularity. While PBASs can vary widely across sectors, they share three main components: goals, incentives, and measures. Research suggests that PBASs influence provider behaviors, but little is known about PBAS effectiveness at achieving performance goals or about government and agency experiences. This study examines nine PBASs that are drawn from five sectors: child care, education, health care, public health emergency preparedness, and transportation. In the right circumstances, a PBAS can be an effective strategy for improving service delivery. Optimum circumstances include having a widely shared goal, unambiguous observable measures, meaningful incentives for those with control over the relevant inputs and processes, few competing interests, and adequate resources to design, implement, and operate the PBAS. However, these conditions are rarely fully realized, so it is difficult to design and implement PBASs that are uniformly effective. PBASs represent a promising policy option for improving the quality of service-delivery activities in many contexts. The evidence supports continued experimentation with and adoption of this approach in appropriate circumstances. Even so, PBAS design and its prospects for success depend on the context in which it will operate. Also, ongoing system evaluation and monitoring are integral components of a PBAS; they inform refinements that improve system functioning over time. Empirical evidence of the effects of performance-based public management is scarce. This article also describes a framework used to evaluate a PBAS. Such a system identifies individuals or organizations that must change their behavior for the performance of an activity to improve, chooses an implicit or explicit incentive structure to motivate these organizations or individuals to change, and then chooses performance measures tailored to inform the incentive structure appropriately. The study focused on systems in the child care, education, health care, public health emergency preparedness, and transportation sectors, mainly in the United States. Analysts could use this framework to seek empirical information in other sectors and other parts of the world. Additional empirical information could help refine existing PBASs and, more broadly, improve decisions on where to initiate new PBASs, how to implement them, and then how to design, manage, and refine them over time.
基于绩效的问责制系统(PBASs)将激励措施与所衡量的绩效挂钩,以此作为改善公共服务的一种手段,现已广受欢迎。虽然PBASs在不同部门可能差异很大,但它们有三个主要组成部分:目标、激励措施和衡量标准。研究表明,PBASs会影响提供者的行为,但对于PBASs在实现绩效目标方面的有效性以及政府和机构的经验却知之甚少。本研究考察了来自五个部门的九个PBASs:儿童保育、教育、医疗保健、公共卫生应急准备和交通运输。在适当的情况下,PBAS可以成为改善服务提供的有效策略。最佳情况包括有一个广泛共享的目标、明确可观察的衡量标准、对控制相关投入和流程的人员有意义的激励措施、很少有相互竞争的利益以及有足够的资源来设计、实施和运营PBAS。然而,这些条件很少能完全实现,因此很难设计和实施始终有效的PBAS。PBAS是在许多情况下改善服务提供活动质量的一个有前景的政策选择。证据支持在适当情况下继续试验和采用这种方法。即便如此,PBAS的设计及其成功前景取决于其运行的背景。此外,持续的系统评估和监测是PBAS的组成部分;它们为改进系统功能的细化提供信息。基于绩效的公共管理效果的实证证据很少。本文还描述了一个用于评估PBAS的框架。这样一个系统确定为了改善一项活动的绩效而必须改变其行为的个人或组织,选择一种隐性或显性的激励结构来促使这些组织或个人改变,然后选择适合为激励结构提供适当信息的绩效衡量标准。该研究主要关注美国儿童保育、教育、医疗保健、公共卫生应急准备和交通运输部门的系统。分析人员可以使用这个框架在世界其他地区和其他部门寻找实证信息。更多的实证信息有助于完善现有的PBAS,更广泛地说,有助于改进关于在何处启动新的PBAS、如何实施它们以及随后如何随着时间的推移设计、管理和完善它们的决策。