Pineo Helen, Glonti Ketevan, Rutter Harry, Zimmermann Nicole, Wilkinson Paul, Davies Michael
Institute of Environmental Design and Engineering, Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, WC1H 0NN, UK.
ECOHOST-The Centre for Health and Social Change, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 13;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0406-x.
There is wide agreement that there is a lack of attention to health in municipal environmental policy-making, such as urban planning and regeneration. Explanations for this include differing professional norms between health and urban environment professionals, system complexity and limited evidence for causality between attributes of the built environment and health outcomes. Data from urban health indicator (UHI) tools are potentially a valuable form of evidence for local government policy and decision-makers. Although many UHI tools have been specifically developed to inform policy, there is poor understanding of how they are used. This study aims to identify the nature and characteristics of UHI tools and their use by municipal built environment policy and decision-makers.
Health and social sciences databases (ASSIA, Campbell Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, Social Policy and Practice and Web of Science Core Collection) will be searched for studies using UHI tools alongside hand-searching of key journals and citation searches of included studies. Advanced searches of practitioner websites and Google will also be used to find grey literature. Search results will be screened for UHI tools, and for studies which report on or evaluate the use of such tools. Data about UHI tools will be extracted to compile a census and taxonomy of existing tools based on their specific characteristics and purpose. In addition, qualitative and quantitative studies about the use of these tools will be appraised using quality appraisal tools produced by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and synthesised in order to gain insight into the perceptions, value and use of UHI tools in the municipal built environment policy and decision-making process. This review is not registered with PROSPERO.
This systematic review focuses specifically on UHI tools that assess the physical environment's impact on health (such as transport, housing, air quality and greenspace). This study will help indicator producers understand whether this form of evidence is of value to built environment policy and decision-makers and how such tools should be tailored for this audience.
N/A.
人们普遍认为，市政环境政策制定（如城市规划和更新）中对健康缺乏关注。对此的解释包括健康专业人员和城市环境专业人员之间不同的专业规范、系统复杂性以及建筑环境属性与健康结果之间因果关系的证据有限。城市健康指标（UHI）工具的数据可能是地方政府政策和决策者的一种有价值的证据形式。尽管许多UHI工具是专门为政策提供信息而开发的，但对其使用方式却了解甚少。本研究旨在确定UHI工具的性质和特点，以及市政建筑环境政策和决策者对其的使用情况。
将检索健康与社会科学数据库（ASSIA、坎贝尔图书馆、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Scopus、社会政策与实践以及科学引文索引核心合集），查找使用UHI工具的研究，同时手动检索关键期刊并对纳入研究进行引文检索。还将对从业者网站和谷歌进行高级搜索，以查找灰色文献。将筛选搜索结果中的UHI工具，以及报告或评估此类工具使用情况的研究。将提取有关UHI工具的数据，以根据其具体特征和用途编制现有工具的普查和分类法。此外，将使用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所（NICE）制作的质量评估工具对有关这些工具使用情况的定性和定量研究进行评估，并进行综合分析，以便深入了解UHI工具在市政建筑环境政策和决策过程中的认知、价值和使用情况。本综述未在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库（PROSPERO）注册。
本系统评价专门关注评估物理环境对健康影响（如交通、住房、空气质量和绿地）的UHI工具。本研究将帮助指标生产者了解这种证据形式对建筑环境政策和决策者是否有价值，以及此类工具应如何针对该受众进行定制。
无。
