• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

案例研究:旧金山利用社区指标促进健康的城市发展。

Case study: San Francisco's use of neighborhood indicators to encourage healthy urban development.

作者信息

Bhatia Rajiv

机构信息

Rajiv Bhatia (

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Nov;33(11):1914-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0661.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0661
PMID:25367985
Abstract

Neighborhood indicators are quantitative measures of neighborhood quality, including measures of attributes such as crime, noise, proximity to parks, transit services, social capital, and student performance. In 2007 the San Francisco Department of Public Health, with broad public input, developed a comprehensive system of neighborhood indicators to inform, influence, and monitor decisions made by the Department of City Planning and other community development institutions. Local public agencies, businesses, and citizens' groups used the indicators to identify disparities in environmental and social conditions, inform and shape neighborhood land use plans, select appropriate sites for development projects, craft new environmental regulations, and justify demands on developers to make financial contributions to community infrastructure. Among other things, the use of indicators contributed to policies to prevent residential displacement, a city ordinance requiring stricter building ventilation standards in areas with high air pollution, and the redeployment of traffic police to high-injury corridors. Data that can be used to create neighborhood indicators are increasingly available, and participation by public health and health care institutions in the indicators' development, dissemination, and application could help improve several conditions that contribute to poor population health.

摘要

社区指标是对社区质量的量化衡量,包括对犯罪、噪音、与公园的距离、交通服务、社会资本和学生成绩等属性的衡量。2007年,旧金山公共卫生部在广泛的公众参与下,开发了一个全面的社区指标系统,以告知、影响和监督城市规划部和其他社区发展机构所做的决策。当地公共机构、企业和公民团体利用这些指标来识别环境和社会条件方面的差异,为社区土地利用规划提供信息并塑造规划,为开发项目选择合适的地点,制定新的环境法规,并要求开发商为社区基础设施做出财政贡献。指标的使用促成了多项政策,包括防止居民流离失所的政策、一项要求在空气污染严重地区实施更严格建筑通风标准的城市条例,以及将交通警察重新部署到高伤害走廊。可用于创建社区指标的数据越来越多,公共卫生和医疗保健机构参与指标的制定、传播和应用有助于改善一些导致人群健康状况不佳的条件。

相似文献

1
Case study: San Francisco's use of neighborhood indicators to encourage healthy urban development.案例研究:旧金山利用社区指标促进健康的城市发展。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Nov;33(11):1914-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0661.
2
Creating tools for healthy development: case study of San Francisco's Eastern Neighborhoods Community Health Impact Assessment.打造促进健康发展的工具:旧金山东部社区健康影响评估案例研究
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 May-Jun;14(3):255-65. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000316484.72759.7b.
3
Integrating public health and community development to tackle neighborhood distress and promote well-being.整合公共卫生与社区发展以应对邻里困境并促进福祉。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Nov;33(11):1890-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0640.
4
[Health impact assessment of the San Fernando street renewal project in Alcalá de Guadaíra (Seville, Spain)].[阿尔卡拉-德瓜代拉(西班牙塞维利亚)圣费尔南多街道翻新项目的健康影响评估]
Gac Sanit. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
5
A health-in-all-policies approach addresses many of Richmond, California's place-based hazards, stressors.“健康融入所有政策”方针解决了加利福尼亚州里士满市许多基于地点的危害和压力源问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Nov;33(11):1905-13. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0652.
6
Protecting health using an environmental impact assessment: a case study of San Francisco land use decisionmaking.利用环境影响评估保护健康:以旧金山土地利用决策为例的研究
Am J Public Health. 2007 Mar;97(3):406-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.073817. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
7
The intersection of urban planning, art, and public health: the Sunnyside Piazza.城市规划、艺术与公共卫生的交汇点:阳光广场。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Sep;93(9):1439-41. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1439.
8
Ecocity mapping using GIS: introducing a planning method for assessing and improving neighborhood vitality.利用地理信息系统进行生态城市绘图:引入一种评估和改善社区活力的规划方法。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Spring;7(1):95-106. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0000.
9
Lessons from San Francisco: health impact assessments have advanced political conditions for improving population health.旧金山的经验教训:健康影响评估为改善人口健康状况创造了有利的政治条件。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2410-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1303.
10
The Healthy Neighborhoods Project: a local health department's role in catalyzing community development.健康社区项目:地方卫生部门在促进社区发展中的作用
Health Educ Behav. 1998 Apr;25(2):146-59. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500204.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards healthy urbanism: inclusive, equitable and sustainable (THRIVES) - an urban design and planning framework from theory to praxis.迈向健康城市主义:包容、公平与可持续(THRIVES)——一个从理论到实践的城市设计与规划框架。
Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):974-992. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1769527. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Multidimensional attributes of neighbourhood quality: A systematic review.邻里环境质量的多维属性:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 19;9(11):e22636. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22636. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Characteristics and use of urban health indicator tools by municipal built environment policy and decision-makers: a systematic review protocol.
市政建筑环境政策与决策者对城市健康指标工具的特征及使用情况:一项系统综述方案
Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 13;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0406-x.
4
A Tool for Providing Data on Small Areas: Development of Neighborhood Profiles for Santa Clara County, California, 2014.一种提供小区域数据的工具:2014年加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县邻里概况的编制
Public Health Rep. 2016 Jan-Feb;131(1):35-43. doi: 10.1177/003335491613100109.
5
Towards an international taxonomy of integrated primary care: a Delphi consensus approach.迈向国际综合初级保健分类法:德尔菲共识法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 May 22;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0278-x.