Schwartz Jonathan, Yen Muh-Yong
Department of Political Science, State University of New York, New Paltz, NY 12561, USA.
Division of Infectious Disease, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017 Apr;50(2):125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
Over time, as newly emerging infectious diseases have become increasingly common and more easily spread, it has become clear that traditional response mechanisms have proven inadequate to the task of prevention and control.
To explore whether enhanced cooperation with local government and community institutions can effectively supplement traditional state-centric public health epidemic responses.
Drawing on Taiwan as a case study, we assess the role of the whole-of-society approach to epidemic response as arises from the collaborative governance literature. The approach calls for enhanced cooperation, trust building, resource sharing and consensus-oriented decision making among multiple levels of government, business, non-profits, and the public in general.
The Taiwan case illustrates the benefits of the whole-of-society approach. Enhanced cooperation between state, local government and non-state institutions, particularly neighborhood committees, has resulted in a strengthened, holistic epidemic preparedness and response infrastructure.
The Taiwan case provides evidence that by implementing the whole-of-society approach to pandemic preparedness and response governments can enhance their ability to manage future outbreaks. We recommend that governments beyond Taiwan's borders seriously consider adopting this approach.
随着时间的推移,新出现的传染病日益常见且传播更为容易,传统应对机制已明显不足以承担预防和控制任务这一点变得愈发清晰。
探讨与地方政府及社区机构加强合作能否有效补充以国家为中心的传统公共卫生疫情应对措施。
以台湾为例进行研究,我们根据协同治理文献评估全社会参与疫情应对方法的作用。该方法要求政府、企业、非营利组织及广大公众等多个层面加强合作、建立信任、共享资源并以共识为导向进行决策。
台湾的案例说明了全社会参与方法的益处。国家、地方政府与非国家机构,特别是居委会之间加强合作,已形成了一个强化的、全面的疫情防范和应对基础设施。
台湾的案例证明,通过实施全社会参与的大流行防范和应对方法,政府能够提高管理未来疫情爆发的能力。我们建议台湾以外地区的政府认真考虑采用这种方法。