Cooper Frederick
Department of History, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Palgrave Commun. 2016 Jul 12;2:16042. doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.42.
Post-war medical debates about the psychiatric consequences of married women's economic behaviour witnessed far more divergence and collision between perspectives than has often been acknowledged. Practitioners who approached women primarily as facilitators of family health-as wives and mothers-were mistrustful of the competing demands presented by paid employment. They were faced by a growing spectrum of opinion, however, which represented women as atrophying in the confines of domestic life, and which positioned work as a therapeutic act. Advocates of work tapped into anxieties about family instability by emphasizing the dangers posed by frustrated housewives, shifting clinical faith away from full-time motherhood, but nevertheless allowing responsibilities towards husbands and children to continue to frame argument about women's behaviour. Doctors, researchers and social critics, in this context, became preoccupied with questions of balance, mapping a path which sought to harmonize public and private fulfilment, identity and responsibility. This article traces this discursive shift through a series of conferences held by the Medical Women's International Association during the early-to-mid 1950s, connecting debates in Britain with systems of broader intellectual exchange. It enriches and complicates historical knowledge of post-war relationships between medicine and feminism, at the same time as offering a conceptual and linguistic context for modern discussion about work-life balance and gender. This article is published as part of a collection entitled "On balance: lifestyle, mental health and wellbeing".
战后关于职业女性经济行为对精神健康影响的医学辩论中,不同观点之间的分歧和冲突远比人们通常认为的要多。那些主要将女性视为家庭健康促进者——即妻子和母亲——的从业者,对有偿工作带来的相互竞争的需求持怀疑态度。然而,他们面临着越来越多的观点,这些观点认为女性在家庭生活的局限中逐渐萎缩,并且将工作视为一种治疗行为。工作的倡导者通过强调沮丧的家庭主妇所带来的危险,利用了人们对家庭不稳定的焦虑,将临床信念从全职母亲身份上转移开,但仍然让对丈夫和孩子的责任继续成为关于女性行为争论的框架。在这种背景下,医生、研究人员和社会评论家开始关注平衡问题,探寻一条旨在协调公共和私人成就、身份和责任的道路。本文通过医学女性国际协会在20世纪50年代初至中期举办的一系列会议,追溯了这种话语转变,将英国的辩论与更广泛的知识交流体系联系起来。它丰富并复杂化了关于战后医学与女权主义关系的历史知识,同时为关于工作与生活平衡及性别的现代讨论提供了概念和语言背景。本文作为名为《论平衡:生活方式、心理健康与幸福》的文集的一部分发表。