Burkey Matthew D, Ghimire Lajina, Adhikari Ramesh P, Kohrt Brandon A, Jordans Mark J D, Haroz Emily, Wissow Lawrence
Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Tel 250-392-4481.
Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO) Nepal, PO Box 8974, Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal. Tel +977-01-4431717.
Int J Cult Ment Health. 2016;9(4):387-398. doi: 10.1080/17542863.2016.1226372. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
Systematic processes are needed to develop valid measurement instruments for disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs) in cross-cultural settings. We employed a four-step process in Nepal to identify and select items for a culturally valid assessment instrument: 1) We extracted items from validated scales and local free-list interviews. 2) Parents, teachers, and peers (n=30) rated the perceived relevance and importance of behavior problems. 3) Highly rated items were piloted with children (n=60) in Nepal. 4) We evaluated internal consistency of the final scale. We identified 49 symptoms from 11 scales, and 39 behavior problems from free-list interviews (n=72). After dropping items for low ratings of relevance and severity and for poor item-test correlation, low frequency, and/or poor acceptability in pilot testing, 16 items remained for the Disruptive Behavior International Scale-Nepali version (DBIS-N). The final scale had good internal consistency (α=0.86). A 4-step systematic approach to scale development including local participation yielded an internally consistent scale that included culturally relevant behavior problems.
在跨文化背景下,需要系统的流程来开发用于破坏性行为障碍(DBDs)的有效测量工具。我们在尼泊尔采用了四步流程来识别和选择用于文化上有效的评估工具的项目:1)我们从经过验证的量表和当地自由列举访谈中提取项目。2)家长、教师和同龄人(n = 30)对行为问题的感知相关性和重要性进行评分。3)对高评分项目在尼泊尔的儿童(n = 60)中进行预试验。4)我们评估了最终量表的内部一致性。我们从11个量表中识别出49个症状,从自由列举访谈(n = 72)中识别出39个行为问题。在因相关性和严重程度评分低、项目 - 测试相关性差、频率低和/或在预试验中可接受性差而删除项目后,破坏性行为国际量表 - 尼泊尔版(DBIS - N)保留了16个项目。最终量表具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.86)。一种包括当地参与的四步系统量表开发方法产生了一个内部一致的量表,该量表包含了与文化相关的行为问题。