Garcia-Manero Guillermo, Montalban-Bravo Guillermo, Berdeja Jesus G, Abaza Yasmin, Jabbour Elias, Essell James, Lyons Roger M, Ravandi Farhad, Maris Michael, Heller Brian, DeZern Amy E, Babu Sunil, Wright David, Anz Bertrand, Boccia Ralph, Komrokji Rami S, Kuriakose Philip, Reeves James, Sekeres Mikkael A, Kantarjian Hagop M, Ghalie Richard, Roboz Gail J
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30533. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
The prognosis of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remains poor despite available therapies. Histone deacetylase inhibitors have demonstrated activity in patients with MDS and in vitro synergy with azacitidine.
A phase 2 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of azacitidine and pracinostat was conducted in patients who had International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-2-risk or high-risk MDS. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate by cycle 6 of therapy.
Of 102 randomized patients, there were 51 in the pracinostat group and 51 in the placebo group. The median age was 69 years. The CR rate by cycle 6 of therapy was 18% and 33% (P = .07) in the pracinostat and placebo groups, respectively. No significant differences in overall survival (median, 16 vs 19 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-2.23) or progression-free survival (11 vs 9 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.546-1.46) were observed between groups. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred more frequently in the pracinostat group (98% vs 74%), leading to more treatment discontinuations (20% vs 10%).
The combination of azacitidine with pracinostat did not improve outcomes in patients with higher-risk MDS. Higher rates of treatment discontinuation may partially explain these results, suggesting alternative dosing and schedules to improve tolerability may be required to determine the potential of the combination. Cancer 2017;123:994-1002. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
尽管有可用的治疗方法,但高危骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的预后仍然很差。组蛋白去乙酰化酶抑制剂已在MDS患者中显示出活性,并在体外与阿扎胞苷具有协同作用。
对国际预后评分系统中2期或高危MDS患者进行了一项阿扎胞苷和普拉西诺司他的2期随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。主要终点是治疗第6周期时的完全缓解(CR)率。
102例随机分组的患者中,普拉西诺司他组51例,安慰剂组51例。中位年龄为69岁。治疗第6周期时,普拉西诺司他组和安慰剂组的CR率分别为18%和33%(P = 0.07)。两组之间在总生存期(中位分别为16个月和19个月;风险比,1.21;95%置信区间,0.66 - 2.23)或无进展生存期(分别为11个月和9个月;风险比,0.82;95%置信区间,0.546 - 1.46)方面未观察到显著差异。≥3级不良事件在普拉西诺司他组中更频繁发生(98%对74%),导致更多治疗中断(20%对10%)。
阿扎胞苷与普拉西诺司他联合应用并未改善高危MDS患者的预后。较高的治疗中断率可能部分解释了这些结果,提示可能需要替代给药方案和时间表以提高耐受性,从而确定联合应用的潜力。《癌症》2017年;123:994 - 1002。©2016美国癌症协会。