• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们目前在急症医院照顾临终患者的情况如何: 遗属的看法?

How well do we currently care for our dying patients in acute hospitals: the views of the bereaved relatives?

机构信息

Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool (MCPCIL), Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;7(3):316-325. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000810. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000810
PMID:28096171
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5574388/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Care of the Dying Audit-Hospitals (NCDAH) is used as a method to evaluate care for dying patients in England. An additional component to the 2013/2014 audit was the Local Survey of Bereaved Relatives Views using the 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE) questionnaire.

AIM

Within the context of the NCDAH audit, to evaluate quality of care provided to dying patients and their families in acute hospitals from the perspective of bereaved relatives.

DESIGN

Postbereavement survey to bereaved relatives.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: For acute hospitals wishing to participate, consecutive 'expected' adult deaths occurring between 1 May and 30 June 2013 were identified and the CODE questionnaire was sent to the next-of-kin.

RESULTS

From 3414 eligible next-of-kin, 95 (2.8%) were excluded due to being involved in a complaint procedure and 1006 (29.5%) due to insufficient next-of-kin details. From the remaining 2313 potential participants, 858 returned a completed CODE questionnaire (37.1% response rate). Generally, symptoms were perceived to be well controlled with 769 (91%) participants reporting that either no pain was present or only there 'some of the time'. Unmet information needs, however, was a recognised area for improvement, for example, 230 (29%) reporting having a discussion about hydration would have been beneficial.

CONCLUSIONS

Adopting a postbereavement survey to NCDAH appears to be feasible, acceptable and a valuable addition. On the whole, the majority of participants reported good or excellent care. A small but significant minority, however, perceived poor quality of patient care with clear and timely communication urgently needed.

摘要

背景

英国全国临终关怀医院审计(NCDAH)被用作评估英格兰临终患者护理的一种方法。2013/2014 年审计的另一个组成部分是使用“临终关怀评估”(CODE)问卷对死者亲属进行的“地方死者亲属意见调查”。

目的

在 NCDAH 审计的背景下,从死者亲属的角度评估急性医院临终患者及其家属所接受的护理质量。

设计

对死者亲属进行死后调查。

地点/参与者:愿意参与的急性医院,确定 2013 年 5 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间连续发生的“预期”成年死亡人数,并向近亲发送 CODE 问卷。

结果

在 3414 名符合条件的近亲中,因参与投诉程序而被排除的有 95 人(2.8%),因近亲详细信息不足而被排除的有 1006 人(29.5%)。在剩余的 2313 名潜在参与者中,有 858 人返回了一份填写完整的 CODE 问卷(37.1%的回应率)。一般来说,症状被认为得到了很好的控制,769 名(91%)参与者报告说没有疼痛或只有“有时”有疼痛。然而,未满足的信息需求是一个需要改进的领域,例如,230 名(29%)受访者表示,关于补液的讨论将是有益的。

结论

在 NCDAH 中采用死后调查似乎是可行的、可接受的,也是一个有价值的补充。总的来说,大多数参与者报告说护理质量良好或优秀。然而,一小部分人认为患者护理质量较差,迫切需要进行明确和及时的沟通。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051c/5574388/22491cb3b9f7/bmjspcare-2014-000810f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051c/5574388/3d465d970a99/bmjspcare-2014-000810f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051c/5574388/22491cb3b9f7/bmjspcare-2014-000810f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051c/5574388/3d465d970a99/bmjspcare-2014-000810f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/051c/5574388/22491cb3b9f7/bmjspcare-2014-000810f02.jpg

相似文献

1
How well do we currently care for our dying patients in acute hospitals: the views of the bereaved relatives?我们目前在急症医院照顾临终患者的情况如何: 遗属的看法?
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;7(3):316-325. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000810. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
2
Quality assurance for care of the dying: engaging with clinical services to facilitate a regional cross-sectional survey of bereaved relatives' views.临终关怀的质量保证:与临床服务机构合作,以开展一项关于丧亲亲属观点的区域性横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 10;18(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3558-z.
3
Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives' Survey within Seven Countries.为癌症临终患者提供优质医疗照护,但信息需求未得到满足:七个国家的丧亲家属调查。
Oncologist. 2021 Jul;26(7):e1273-e1284. doi: 10.1002/onco.13837. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
4
A comparison of the quality of care provided to cancer patients in the UK in the last three months of life in in-patient hospices compared with hospitals, from the perspective of bereaved relatives: results from a survey using the VOICES questionnaire.从临终关怀医院和医院中接受治疗的癌症患者在生命的最后三个月内所接受的护理质量比较:使用 VOICES 问卷进行调查的结果,从失去亲人的亲属的角度来看。
Palliat Med. 2009 Apr;23(3):190-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216309102525. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Dying in acute hospitals: voices of bereaved relatives.在急症医院去世:失去亲人的亲属的声音。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 31;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0464-z.
6
Caring for those who die at home: the use and validation of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE) with bereaved relatives.照顾在家中离世者:对丧亲家属使用“临终关怀评估”(CODE)并进行效度验证。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014 Jun;4(2):167-174. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000596. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
Validation of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE) within an international study exploring bereaved relatives' perceptions about quality of care in the last days of life.在一项国际研究中验证“临终关怀评估”(CODE),该研究旨在探讨失去亲人的家属对生命最后几天的护理质量的看法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jul;64(1):e23-e33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.340. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
8
Effect of palliative care nurse champions on the quality of dying in the hospital according to bereaved relatives: A controlled before-and-after study.根据丧亲家属的反馈,姑息治疗护士倡导者对医院临终质量的影响:一项前后对照研究。
Palliat Med. 2016 Feb;30(2):180-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216315588008. Epub 2015 May 19.
9
Assessing quality of care for the dying: the development and initial validation of a postal self-completion questionnaire for bereaved relatives.评估临终关怀质量:为丧亲亲属开发和初步验证的邮寄自填式问卷。
Palliat Med. 2012 Oct;26(7):897-907. doi: 10.1177/0269216311424953. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
10
Assessment of the quality of end-of-life care: translation and validation of the German version of the "Care of the Dying Evaluation" (CODE-GER) - a questionnaire for bereaved relatives.终末期护理质量评估:“临终关怀评估”(CODE-GER)德文版的翻译和验证 - 一种针对丧亲家属的问卷。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 22;18(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01473-2.

引用本文的文献

1
How to Evaluate Hospital Care in the Dying Phase-Development of a Data Extraction Tool for Retrospective Medical Record Analysis.如何评估临终阶段的医院护理——用于回顾性病历分析的数据提取工具的开发
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70174. doi: 10.1111/jep.70174.
2
"You're just in such crisis mode…frantic to get through the next day": an interpretative phenomenological analysis of adjustment experiences among carers of patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer.“你正处于这样的危机模式……急切地想要熬过第二天”:对晚期食管胃癌患者照料者适应经历的诠释现象学分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01810-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
We must not deprive dying people of the most important protection.我们绝不能剥夺垂危病人最重要的保护。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 3;349:g4311. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4311.
2
Why the Assisted Dying Bill should become law in England and Wales.为何《协助死亡法案》应在英格兰和威尔士成为法律。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 2;349:g4349. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4349.
3
Is effective, person-centred, home-based palliative care truly achievable?有效的、以人为本的居家姑息治疗真的能够实现吗?
Dying, death and bereavement: developing a national survey of bereaved relatives.
死亡、濒死和丧亲:开展一项针对丧亲亲属的全国性调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Feb 23;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01135-2.
4
Medical communication and decision-making about assisted hydration in the last days of life: A qualitative study of doctors experienced with end of life care.生命末期辅助补液的医学沟通和决策:对有临终关怀经验的医生的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;36(7):1080-1091. doi: 10.1177/02692163221097309. Epub 2022 May 21.
5
Dying in hospital in Germany - optimising care in the dying phase: study protocol for a multi-centre bottom-up intervention on ward level.在德国医院死亡-优化临终关怀:一项基于病房层面的多中心自下而上干预研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 May 6;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00960-1.
6
Palliative Care in Older People with Multimorbidities: A Scoping Review on the Palliative Care Needs of Patients, Carers, and Health Professionals.老年人多病共存的姑息治疗:对患者、照护者和卫生专业人员姑息治疗需求的范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063195.
7
Good Quality Care for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospitals, but Information Needs Unmet: Bereaved Relatives' Survey within Seven Countries.为癌症临终患者提供优质医疗照护,但信息需求未得到满足:七个国家的丧亲家属调查。
Oncologist. 2021 Jul;26(7):e1273-e1284. doi: 10.1002/onco.13837. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
Physical and psychological symptoms and signs in dying digestive tract cancer patients: the East Asian collaborative cross-cultural Study to Elucidate the Dying process (EASED).临终消化道癌症患者的躯体和心理症状与体征:东亚合作跨文化研究以阐明临终过程(EASED)。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jul;29(7):3603-3612. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05866-3. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Assessment of the quality of end-of-life care: translation and validation of the German version of the "Care of the Dying Evaluation" (CODE-GER) - a questionnaire for bereaved relatives.终末期护理质量评估:“临终关怀评估”(CODE-GER)德文版的翻译和验证 - 一种针对丧亲家属的问卷。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Sep 22;18(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01473-2.
10
The quality of care of the dying in hospital-next-of-kin perspectives.临终关怀在医院中的质量:从家属的角度来看。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4527-4537. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05465-2. Epub 2020 May 9.
Palliat Med. 2014 May;28(5):373-4. doi: 10.1177/0269216314529858.
4
Caring for those who die at home: the use and validation of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE) with bereaved relatives.照顾在家中离世者:对丧亲家属使用“临终关怀评估”(CODE)并进行效度验证。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014 Jun;4(2):167-174. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000596. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
5
What influences attitudes towards clinically assisted hydration in the care of dying patients? A review of the literature.在临终患者护理中,哪些因素会影响对临床辅助补液的态度?文献综述。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Sep;5(3):223-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000562. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
6
Imminence of death among hospital inpatients: Prevalent cohort study.医院住院患者的死亡紧迫性:现患队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jun;28(6):474-479. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526443.
7
Assessing the quality of care for dying patients from the bereaved relatives' perspective: further validation of "Evaluating care and health outcomes--for the dying".从丧亲家属的角度评估临终患者的护理质量:《评估护理与健康结局——针对临终者》的进一步验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Apr;47(4):687-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
8
The end of the Liverpool Care Pathway?利物浦护理路径的终结?
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):926-7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70379-6.
9
Does the 'Liverpool Care Pathway' facilitate an improvement in quality of care for dying cancer patients?“利物浦姑息治疗路径”是否能提高临终癌症患者的护理质量?
Br J Cancer. 2013 May 28;108(10):1942-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.203. Epub 2013 May 16.
10
Staff perceptions of end-of-life care following implementation of the liverpool care pathway for the dying patient in the acute care setting: a New Zealand perspective.在急性护理环境中为临终患者实施利物浦关怀路径后,工作人员对临终关怀的看法:新西兰视角。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Apr;15(4):468-73. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0375.