• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对健康信息共享的信任:系统信任的衡量标准。

Public Trust in Health Information Sharing: A Measure of System Trust.

机构信息

Division of Learning and Knowledge Systems, Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):824-845. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12654. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12654
PMID:28097657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5867170/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure public trust in a health information sharing in a broadly defined health system (system trust), inclusive of health care, public health, and research; to identify individual characteristics that predict system trust; and to consider these findings in the context of national health initiatives (e.g., learning health systems and precision medicine) that will expand the scope of data sharing.

DATA SOURCES

Survey data (n = 1,011) were collected in February 2014.

STUDY DESIGN

We constructed a composite index of four dimensions of system trust-competency, fidelity, integrity, and trustworthiness. The index was used in linear regression evaluating demographic and psychosocial predictors of system trust.

DATA COLLECTION

Data were collected by GfK Custom using a nationally representative sample and analyzed in Stata 13.0.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Our findings suggest the public's trust may not meet the needs of health systems as they enter an era of expanded data sharing. We found that a majority of the U.S. public does not trust the organizations that have health information and share it (i.e., the health system) in one or more dimensions. Together, demographic and psychosocial factors accounted for ~18 percent of the observed variability in system trust. Future research should consider additional predictors of system trust such as knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs to inform policies and practices for health data sharing.

摘要

目的

衡量公众对广泛定义的卫生系统(系统信任)中健康信息共享的信任程度,包括医疗保健、公共卫生和研究;确定预测系统信任的个体特征;并在将扩大数据共享范围的国家卫生倡议(例如学习型卫生系统和精准医学)背景下考虑这些发现。

数据来源

调查数据(n=1011)于 2014 年 2 月收集。

研究设计

我们构建了系统信任的四个维度(能力、保真度、完整性和可信度)的综合指数。该指数用于线性回归,评估人口统计学和社会心理预测因素对系统信任的影响。

数据收集

GfK Custom 使用全国代表性样本进行数据收集,并在 Stata 13.0 中进行分析。

主要发现

我们的研究结果表明,随着卫生系统进入扩大数据共享的时代,公众的信任可能无法满足卫生系统的需求。我们发现,大多数美国公众在一个或多个维度上不信任拥有健康信息并共享信息的组织(即卫生系统)。人口统计学和社会心理因素共同解释了系统信任观察到的可变性的约 18%。未来的研究应考虑系统信任的其他预测因素,例如知识、态度和信念,以为卫生数据共享的政策和实践提供信息。

相似文献

1
Public Trust in Health Information Sharing: A Measure of System Trust.公众对健康信息共享的信任:系统信任的衡量标准。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):824-845. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12654. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
2
Public trust in health information sharing: implications for biobanking and electronic health record systems.公众对健康信息共享的信任:对生物样本库和电子健康记录系统的影响。
J Pers Med. 2015 Feb 3;5(1):3-21. doi: 10.3390/jpm5010003.
3
Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers.影响加州消费者共享电子健康数据意愿的因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0185-x.
4
Americans' Trust in Health Information Sources: Trends and Sociodemographic Predictors.美国人对健康信息来源的信任:趋势与社会人口统计学预测因素
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Nov;33(8):1187-1193. doi: 10.1177/0890117119861280. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Personal health information in research: Perceived risk, trustworthiness and opinions from patients attending a tertiary healthcare facility.研究中的个人健康信息:来自三级医疗机构就诊患者的感知风险、信任度和意见。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103222. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103222. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
6
Greater patient health information control to improve the sustainability of health information exchanges.提高患者健康信息控制水平,增强健康信息交换的可持续性。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
7
Consent and widespread access to personal health information for the delivery of care: a large scale telephone survey of consumers' attitudes using vignettes in New Zealand.为提供医疗服务而获取个人健康信息的同意与广泛获取:一项在新西兰使用 vignettes 对消费者态度进行的大规模电话调查。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 23;6(8):e011640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011640.
8
Differing Strategies to Meet Information-Sharing Needs: Publicly Supported Community Health Information Exchanges Versus Health Systems' Enterprise Health Information Exchanges.满足信息共享需求的不同策略:公共支持的社区健康信息交换与卫生系统的企业健康信息交换
Milbank Q. 2016 Mar;94(1):77-108. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12180.
9
Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.消费者对医疗保健和研究领域电子数据共享的看法比较。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):821-30. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv014. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
10
Systematic review of participants' attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis.系统综述参与者对数据共享的态度:主题综合分析。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Apr;23(2):123-133. doi: 10.1177/1355819617751555.

引用本文的文献

1
Comfort With Sharing Food Insecurity Risk for Clinical Care Among Individuals With and Without a Cancer History: Findings From a National Survey.有或无癌症病史个体在临床护理中分享粮食不安全风险的舒适度:一项全国性调查的结果
AJPM Focus. 2025 Jul 24;4(5):100395. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100395. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Evolutionary game analysis of healthcare data governance in China's experimental data trading pilots.中国实验性数据交易试点中医疗数据治理的演化博弈分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Sep 1;8(1):562. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01950-2.
3
Religious factors predict support for genomic medicine more strongly than politics, education, or trust: A survey of 4,939 adults in the United States.宗教因素比政治、教育或信任更能预测对基因医学的支持:对美国4939名成年人的调查。
Front Genet. 2025 Jun 4;16:1587774. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1587774. eCollection 2025.
4
The Ethics of Informed Consent for Data Registries: Moving Beyond Moral Minimalism to the High Ground.数据登记处知情同意的伦理:从道德最低限度主义迈向更高标准。
Bioethics. 2025 Sep;39(7):709-715. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13438. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
5
Understanding public trust in national electronic health record systems: A multi-national qualitative research study.理解公众对国家电子健康记录系统的信任:一项跨国定性研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 3;11:20552076251333576. doi: 10.1177/20552076251333576. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Expectations of healthcare AI and the role of trust: understanding patient views on how AI will impact cost, access, and patient-provider relationships.对医疗人工智能的期望及信任的作用:了解患者对人工智能将如何影响成本、可及性以及医患关系的看法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):795-799. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf031.
7
Patients' Trust in Health Systems to Use Artificial Intelligence.患者对医疗系统使用人工智能的信任。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2460628. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60628.
8
The Longitudinal Analysis of Patient Perspectives on Data Use in Healthcare: Desire for Notification and Concern About Data Sharing.患者对医疗保健中数据使用观点的纵向分析:对通知的渴望和对数据共享的担忧
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09408-7.
9
Validating a novel measure for assessing patient openness and concerns about using artificial intelligence in healthcare.验证一种用于评估患者对医疗保健中使用人工智能的开放性和担忧的新方法。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Jun 13;9(1):e10429. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10429. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
Examining the Inclusion of Trust and Trust-Building Principles in European Union, Italian, French, and Swiss Health Data Sharing Legislations: A Framework Analysis.审视欧盟、意大利、法国和瑞士健康数据共享立法中信任及信任构建原则的纳入情况:一项框架分析
Milbank Q. 2024 Dec;102(4):973-1003. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12722. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The Business of Trust.信任的本质
Acad Med. 2016 Apr;91(4):462-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001023.
2
Bringing the Common Rule into the 21st Century.让《通用准则》步入21世纪。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 10;373(24):2293-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512205. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
3
Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System: The Importance of Trust and Shared Decision Making.患者对学习型健康系统的看法:信任和共同决策的重要性。
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(9):4-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062163.
4
Public trust in health information sharing: implications for biobanking and electronic health record systems.公众对健康信息共享的信任:对生物样本库和电子健康记录系统的影响。
J Pers Med. 2015 Feb 3;5(1):3-21. doi: 10.3390/jpm5010003.
5
A new initiative on precision medicine.一项关于精准医学的新倡议。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
6
Public trust in physicians--U.S. medicine in international perspective.公众对医生的信任——从国际视角看美国医学
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1570-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1407373.
7
How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature.如何衡量对医疗体系的信任?文献系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Aug;91:10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics.学习型医疗保健系统的伦理框架:对传统研究伦理和临床伦理的背离。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S16-27. doi: 10.1002/hast.134.
9
From the Office of the National Coordinator: the strategy for advancing the exchange of health information.从国家协调员办公室:推进健康信息交流的策略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):527-36. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1314.
10
Preparing for precision medicine.为精准医学做准备。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):489-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1114866. Epub 2012 Jan 18.