Bailey-Davis Lisa, Peyer Karissa L, Fang Yinan, Kim Jae-Kwang, Welk Greg J
1 Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Geisinger Health System , Danville, PA.
2 Health and Human Performance, University of Tennessee-Chattanooga , Chattanooga, TN.
Child Obes. 2017 Apr;13(2):164-171. doi: 10.1089/chi.2016.0177. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
School-based body mass index screenings (SBMIS) have been controversial. We aimed to determine if parents would indicate improved utility with SBMIS when the report included parent education and whether parental intent to modify obesity risk factors would vary with report type or child weight.
A cluster-controlled trial was conducted with 31 elementary schools randomized to distribute a standard SBMIS report or the standard report plus education (SBMIS+). A random subsample of parents completed a mailed survey (731 SBMIS, 738 SBMIS+). Using a two-stage cluster sampling design, logistic regression models with school-level random effect were used to assess differences between conditions and by weight category.
Parents in the SBMIS+ condition vs. the standard condition were more likely to indicate that the report provided useful information (not significant) and an intent to help their child get enough sleep (p < 0.001). Parents of children who were overweight or obese were less likely than parents of children who were not to indicate that the report provided useful information about their child's weight status (p < 0.001) or access to resources (p < 0.05). However, these parents were more likely to plan a visit to healthcare provider (p < 0.001) and to intend to limit sugar-sweetened beverages (p < 0.05).
Parental education can enhance the utility of the SBMIS report and parental intention to modify at least one obesity risk factor. SBMIS reports prompted parents of children with overweight and obesity to seek clinical care and limit sugar-sweetened drinks.
基于学校的体重指数筛查(SBMIS)一直存在争议。我们旨在确定当报告包含家长教育内容时,家长是否会认为SBMIS的实用性有所提高,以及家长改变肥胖风险因素的意图是否会因报告类型或孩子体重而有所不同。
进行了一项整群对照试验,31所小学被随机分配发放标准SBMIS报告或标准报告加教育内容(SBMIS+)。随机抽取的家长子样本完成了邮寄调查(731份SBMIS,738份SBMIS+)。采用两阶段整群抽样设计,使用具有学校水平随机效应的逻辑回归模型来评估不同条件之间以及按体重类别划分的差异。
与标准条件相比,SBMIS+条件下的家长更有可能表示报告提供了有用信息(无显著差异)以及有帮助孩子获得充足睡眠的意图(p < 0.001)。超重或肥胖儿童的家长比非超重或肥胖儿童的家长更不可能表示报告提供了有关孩子体重状况的有用信息(p < 0.001)或获取资源的途径(p < 0.05)。然而,这些家长更有可能计划带孩子去看医疗保健提供者(p < 0.001)并打算限制含糖饮料的摄入(p < 0.05)。
家长教育可以提高SBMIS报告的实用性以及家长改变至少一种肥胖风险因素的意图。SBMIS报告促使超重和肥胖儿童的家长寻求临床护理并限制含糖饮料的摄入。