Suppr超能文献

初诊青光眼患者使用LenStar和Pentacam测量眼前节的比较。

Comparison of anterior segment measurements with LenStar and Pentacam in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma.

作者信息

Sen Emine, Inanc Merve, Elgin Ufuk, Yilmazbas Pelin

机构信息

Ulucanlar Eye Research Hospital, Ulucanlar caddesi. No:59., 06240, Altindag, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;38(1):171-174. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0440-z. Epub 2017 Jan 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare anterior segment measurements obtained using the Pentacam; Oculus, HR and the LenStar LS 900 in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma.

METHODS

Patients with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma who had been treated with PGA were included in the study. Anterior segment measurements including central corneal thickness (CCT), keratometry, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and white-to-white (WTW) corneal diameter obtained with the optic low-coherent reflectometer (LenStar LS-900, Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland) and with the Scheimpflug system (Pentacam; Oculus, HR) were compared. In order to compare LenStar and Pentacam measurements, paired sample t test and 'Bland-Altman' plot were used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two female (59.5%) and 15 male (40.5%) totally 37 cases with newly diagnosed glaucoma were included in the study. Anterior segment parameter measurements obtained with both the LenStar and the Pentacam were significantly correlated for right and left eyes, so the right eye values were used in statistical analysis. WTW and ACD values measured with LenStar were statistically significantly higher than those measured with Pentacam (p: 0.0001, p: 0.0001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the CCT values measured by the two devices (p: 0.217).

CONCLUSION

There was a statistically significant difference between the mean values of ACD and WTW measured with the LenStar and Pentacam. These biometric devices should not be used interchangeably. It should be appropriate to use the same device on follow-up of glaucoma patients.

摘要

目的

比较在新诊断的青光眼患者中使用Pentacam;Oculus,HR和LenStar LS 900获得的眼前节测量值。

方法

纳入接受过前列腺素类似物(PGA)治疗的高眼压症和原发性开角型青光眼患者。比较使用光学低相干反射仪(LenStar LS-900,瑞士Haag-Streit AG公司)和Scheimpflug系统(Pentacam;Oculus,HR)获得的眼前节测量值,包括中央角膜厚度(CCT)、角膜曲率测量、前房深度(ACD)和角膜白对白(WTW)直径。为了比较LenStar和Pentacam的测量值,在统计分析中使用配对样本t检验和“Bland-Altman”图。

结果

本研究共纳入37例新诊断的青光眼患者,其中女性22例(59.5%),男性15例(40.5%)。LenStar和Pentacam获得的眼前节参数测量值在右眼和左眼均显著相关,因此在统计分析中使用右眼值。LenStar测量的WTW和ACD值在统计学上显著高于Pentacam测量的值(p值分别为0.0001和0.0001)。两种设备测量的CCT值之间无统计学显著差异(p值为0.217)。

结论

LenStar和Pentacam测量的ACD和WTW平均值之间存在统计学显著差异。这些生物测量设备不应互换使用。在青光眼患者的随访中使用同一设备应该是合适的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验