Suppr超能文献

使用三种成像技术对正常眼和有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入术后的中央角膜厚度和前房深度测量结果进行比较。

Comparison of central corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth measurements using three imaging technologies in normal eyes and after phakic intraocular lens implantation.

作者信息

Doors Muriël, Cruysberg Lars P J, Berendschot Tos T J M, de Brabander John, Verbakel Frenne, Webers Carroll A B, Nuijts Rudy M M A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;247(8):1139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1086-6. Epub 2009 Apr 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The repeatability and interchangeability of imaging devices measuring central corneal thickness (CCT) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) are important in the assessment of patients considering refractive surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the agreement of CCT and ACD measurements using three imaging technologies in healthy eyes and in eyes after phakic intraocular lens implantation (pIOL).

METHODS

In this comparative study, CCT and ACD were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), Orbscan II, and Pentacam in 33 healthy volunteers (66 eyes) and 22 patients (42 eyes) after pIOL implantation. Intraobserver repeatability was evaluated for all three devices in the healthy volunteer group.

RESULTS

Pairwise comparison of CCT measurements showed significant differences between all devices (P < 0.001), except for the AS-OCT and Orbscan II in the healthy volunteer group (P = 0.422) and the Orbscan II and Pentacam in the pIOL group (P = 0.214). ACD measurements demonstrated significant differences between all pairwise comparisons in both groups (P < or = 0.001). Intraobserver reliability was high for CCT and ACD measurements in the healthy volunteer group, with coefficients of variation ranging from 0.6% to 1.2% and 0.4% to 0.5% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CCT and ACD measurements using AS-OCT, Orbscan II, and Pentacam demonstrated high intraobserver reliability. However, these devices should not be used interchangeably for measurements of CCT and ACD in healthy subject and patients after pIOL implantation.

摘要

背景

在考虑屈光手术的患者评估中,测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)和前房深度(ACD)的成像设备的可重复性和互换性很重要。本研究的目的是调查在健康眼睛和有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入(pIOL)术后眼睛中使用三种成像技术测量CCT和ACD的一致性。

方法

在这项比较研究中,使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)、Orbscan II和Pentacam对33名健康志愿者(66只眼)和22例pIOL植入术后患者(42只眼)的CCT和ACD进行测量。在健康志愿者组中对所有三种设备评估观察者内重复性。

结果

CCT测量的两两比较显示,所有设备之间均存在显著差异(P < 0.001),但健康志愿者组中的AS-OCT和Orbscan II(P = 0.422)以及pIOL组中的Orbscan II和Pentacam(P = 0.214)除外。两组中所有两两比较的ACD测量均显示出显著差异(P≤0.001)。健康志愿者组中CCT和ACD测量的观察者内可靠性较高,变异系数分别为0.6%至1.2%和0.4%至0.5%。

结论

使用AS-OCT、Orbscan II和Pentacam测量CCT和ACD显示出较高的观察者内可靠性。然而,在健康受试者和pIOL植入术后患者中,这些设备在测量CCT和ACD时不应互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef06/2709228/09bc576939cf/417_2009_1086_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验