Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle, WA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;70(2):185-190.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.020. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
Resident productivity, defined as new patients per hour, carries important implications for emergency department operations. In high-volume academic centers, essential staffing decisions can be made on the assumption that residents see patients at a static rate. However, it is unclear whether this model mirrors reality; previous studies have not rigorously examined whether productivity changes over time. We examine residents' productivity across shifts to determine whether it remained consistent.
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in an urban academic hospital with a 3-year emergency medicine training program in which residents acquire patients ad libitum throughout their shift. Time stamps of all patient encounters were automatically logged. A linear mixed model was constructed to predict productivity per shift hour.
A total of 14,364 8- and 9-hour shifts were worked by 75 residents between July 1, 2010, and June 20, 2015. This comprised 6,127 (42.7%) postgraduate year (PGY) 1 shifts, 7,236 (50.4%) PGY-2 shifts, and 998 (6.9%) PGY-3 nonsupervisory shifts (Table 1). Overall, residents treated a mean of 10.1 patients per shift (SD 3.2), with most patients at Emergency Severity Index level 3 or more acute (93.8%). In the initial hour, residents treated a mean of 2.14 patients (SD 1.2), and every subsequent hour was associated with a significant decrease, with the largest in the second, third, and final hours.
Emergency medicine resident productivity during a single shift follows a reliable pattern that decreases significantly hourly, a pattern preserved across PGY years and types of shifts. This suggests that resident productivity is a dynamic process, which should be considered in staffing decisions and studied further.
每小时新患者人数(即住院医师生产力)对急诊科运营具有重要意义。在高容量的学术中心,可以根据住院医师以固定速率看诊患者的假设做出基本人员配置决策。然而,目前尚不清楚这种模式是否反映了现实情况;以前的研究尚未严格检查生产力是否随时间变化。我们检查了住院医师在各班次的工作效率,以确定其是否保持一致。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,在一家拥有为期 3 年的急诊医学培训计划的城市学术医院中进行,该计划中住院医师在其整个班次中自由获取患者。所有患者就诊的时间戳都自动记录。构建了一个线性混合模型来预测每班次小时的生产力。
2010 年 7 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 20 日期间,75 名住院医师共完成了 14364 次 8 小时和 9 小时班次,其中包括 6127 次(42.7%)住院医师 1 年班次、7236 次(50.4%)住院医师 2 年班次和 998 次(6.9%)住院医师 3 年非监督班次(表 1)。总体而言,住院医师平均每班次治疗 10.1 名患者(SD 3.2),大多数患者的紧急严重指数(ESI)为 3 级或更严重(93.8%)。在最初的 1 小时内,住院医师平均治疗 2.14 名患者(SD 1.2),随后每小时都显著减少,其中第二、第三和最后 1 小时减少最多。
在单个班次中,急诊医学住院医师的生产力遵循可靠的模式,即每小时显著下降,这种模式在住院医师年资和班次类型中都保持不变。这表明住院医师生产力是一个动态过程,在人员配置决策中应予以考虑,并进一步研究。