Alali Hanan, Braeckman Lutgart, Van Hecke Tanja, De Clercq Bart, Janssens Heidi, Wahab Magd Abdel
Department of Electrical Energy, Systems and Automation, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University.
J Occup Health. 2017 Mar 28;59(2):177-186. doi: 10.1539/joh.16-0119-OA. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
The main objective of this study is to examine the relationship between indicators of non-standard work arrangements, including precarious contract, long working hours, multiple jobs, shift work, and work-related accident absence, using a representative Belgian sample and considering several socio-demographic and work characteristics.
This study was based on the data of the fifth European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS). For the analysis, the sample was restricted to 3343 respondents from Belgium who were all employed workers. The associations between non-standard work arrangements and work-related accident absence were studied with multivariate logistic regression modeling techniques while adjusting for several confounders.
During the last 12 months, about 11.7% of workers were absent from work because of work-related accident. A multivariate regression model showed an increased injury risk for those performing shift work (OR 1.546, 95% CI 1.074-2.224). The relationship between contract type and occupational injuries was not significant (OR 1.163, 95% CI 0.739-1.831). Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were observed for those performing long working hours (OR 1.217, 95% CI 0.638-2.321) and those performing multiple jobs (OR 1.361, 95% CI 0.827-2.240) in relation to work-related accident absence. Those who rated their health as bad, low educated workers, workers from the construction sector, and those exposed to biomechanical exposure (BM) were more frequent victims of work-related accident absence. No significant gender difference was observed.
Indicators of non-standard work arrangements under this study, except shift work, were not significantly associated with work-related accident absence. To reduce the burden of occupational injuries, not only risk reduction strategies and interventions are needed but also policy efforts are to be undertaken to limit shift work. In general, preventive measures and more training on the job are needed to ensure the safety and well-being of all workers.
本研究的主要目的是,使用具有代表性的比利时样本,并考虑若干社会人口和工作特征,来考察非标准工作安排指标之间的关系,这些指标包括不稳定合同、长时间工作、多份工作、轮班工作以及与工伤相关的缺勤情况。
本研究基于第五次欧洲工作条件调查(EWCS)的数据。为进行分析,样本仅限于来自比利时的3343名受访者,他们均为就业工人。采用多元逻辑回归建模技术研究非标准工作安排与工伤相关缺勤之间的关联,同时对若干混杂因素进行了调整。
在过去12个月中,约11.7%的工人因工伤缺勤。多元回归模型显示,从事轮班工作的人受伤风险增加(比值比1.546,95%置信区间1.074 - 2.224)。合同类型与职业伤害之间的关系不显著(比值比1.163,95%置信区间0.739 - 1.831)。此外,在工伤相关缺勤方面,长时间工作的人(比值比1.217,95%置信区间0.638 - 2.321)和从事多份工作的人(比值比1.361,95%置信区间0.827 - 2.240)未观察到统计学上的显著差异。那些认为自己健康状况差的人、低学历工人、建筑行业的工人以及接触生物力学暴露(BM)的人,更频繁地成为工伤相关缺勤的受害者。未观察到显著的性别差异。
本研究中的非标准工作安排指标,除轮班工作外,与工伤相关缺勤无显著关联。为减轻职业伤害负担,不仅需要风险降低策略和干预措施,还需采取政策措施限制轮班工作。总体而言,需要采取预防措施并加强在职培训,以确保所有工人的安全和福祉。