Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激期间皮肤表面的最小加热

Minimal Heating at the Skin Surface During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

作者信息

Khadka Niranjan, Zannou Adantchede L, Zunara Fatima, Truong Dennis Q, Dmochowski Jacek, Bikson Marom

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2018 Jun;21(4):334-339. doi: 10.1111/ner.12554. Epub 2017 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces a temperature change at the skin surface, if any change is stimulation polarity (anode or cathode) specific, and the contribution of passive heating (joule heat) or blood flow on such change.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Temperature differences (ΔTs) in an agar phantom study and an in vivo study (forearm stimulation) including 20 volunteers with both experimental measures and finite element method (FEM) multiphysics prediction (current flow and bioheat) models of skin comprising three tissue layers (epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous layer with blood perfusion) or of the phantom for active stimulation and control cases were compared. Temperature was measured during pre, post, and stimulation phases for both phantom and subject's forearms using thermocouples.

RESULTS

In the phantom, ΔT under both anode and cathode, compared to control, was not significantly different and less than 0.1°C. Stimulation of subjects resulted in a gradual increase in temperature under both anode and cathode electrodes, compared to control (at t = 20 min: ΔTanode = 0.9°C, ΔTcathode = 1.1°C, ΔTcontrol = 0.05°C). The FEM phantom model predicted comparable maximum ΔT of 0.27°C and 0.28°C (at t = 20 min) for the control and anode/cathode cases, respectively. The FEM skin model predicted a maximum ΔT at t = 20 min of 0.98°C for control and 1.36°C under anode/cathode electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our results indicate a moderate and nonhazardous increase in temperature at the skin surface during 2 mA tDCS that is independent of polarity, and results from stimulation induced blood flow rather than joule heat.

摘要

目的

评估经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是否会在皮肤表面产生温度变化,该变化是否具有刺激极性(阳极或阴极)特异性,以及被动加热(焦耳热)或血流对此变化的影响。

材料与方法

比较琼脂模型研究和体内研究(前臂刺激)中的温度差异(ΔTs),体内研究包括20名志愿者,采用实验测量以及有限元方法(FEM)多物理场预测(电流流动和生物热)模型,皮肤模型包含三个组织层(表皮、真皮和有血液灌注的皮下层),模型研究则针对主动刺激和对照情况。使用热电偶在模型和受试者前臂的预刺激、后刺激阶段测量温度。

结果

在模型中,与对照相比,阳极和阴极下的ΔT均无显著差异且小于0.1°C。与对照相比,刺激受试者导致阳极和阴极电极下的温度逐渐升高(在t = 20分钟时:ΔT阳极 = 0.9°C,ΔT阴极 = 1.1°C,ΔT对照 = 0.05°C)。FEM模型预测对照和阳极/阴极情况下的最大ΔT分别为0.27°C和0.28°C(在t = 20分钟时)。FEM皮肤模型预测在t = 20分钟时,对照的最大ΔT为0.98°C,阳极/阴极电极下为1.36°C。

结论

综上所述,我们的结果表明,在2 mA tDCS期间皮肤表面温度有适度且无害的升高,该升高与极性无关,是由刺激诱导的血流而非焦耳热引起的。

相似文献

9
Bioheat Model of Spinal Column Heating During High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊柱高密度脊髓刺激加热的生物热模型。
Neuromodulation. 2023 Oct;26(7):1362-1370. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.07.006. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

5
Temperature increases by kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation.脊髓刺激的温度以千赫兹频率增加。
Brain Stimul. 2019 Jan-Feb;12(1):62-72. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influence of Skin Redness on Blinding in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies: A Crossover Trial.
Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):248-255. doi: 10.1111/ner.12527. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
7
Minimal heating of aneurysm clips during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.重复经颅磁刺激期间动脉瘤夹的最小加热
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jul;123(7):1471-3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.048. Epub 2011 Nov 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验