Suijker J J, van Rijn M, Ter Riet G, Moll van Charante E P, de Rooij S E, Buurman B M
Jacqueline J Suijker, MD, Academic Medical Center, Department of General Practice and Public Health, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Email:
J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(2):165-172. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0797-8.
To estimate the minimal important change (MIC) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Katz-activities of daily living (ADL) index score and the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scale.
Data from a cluster-randomized clinical trial and a cohort study.
General practices in the Netherlands.
3184 trial participants and 51 participants of the cohort study with a mean age of 80.1 (SD 6.4) years.
At baseline and after 6 months, the Katz-ADL index score (0-6 points), the Lawton IADL scale (0-7 points), and self-perceived decline in (I)ADL were assessed using a self-reporting questionnaire. MIC was assessed using anchor-based methods: the (relative) mean change score; and using distributional methods: the effect size (ES), the standard error of measurement (SEM), and 0.5 SD. The MDC was estimated using SEM, based on a test-retest study (2-week interval) and on the anchor-based method.
Anchor-based MICs of the Katz-ADL index score were 0.47 points, while distributional MICs ranged from 0.18 to 0.47 points. Similarly, anchor-based MICs of the Lawton IADL scale were between 0.31 and 0.54 points and distributional MICs ranged from 0.31 to 0.77 points. The MDC varies by sample size. For the MIC to exceed the MDC at least 482 patients are needed.
The MIC of both the Katz-ADL index and the Lawton IADL scale lie around half a point. The certainty of this conclusion is reduced by the variation across calculational methods.
评估卡茨日常生活活动能力(ADL)指数评分及洛顿工具性日常生活活动能力(IADL)量表的最小重要变化(MIC)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。
来自一项整群随机临床试验和一项队列研究的数据。
荷兰的全科医疗。
3184名试验参与者和51名队列研究参与者,平均年龄80.1岁(标准差6.4岁)。
在基线期和6个月后,使用自填问卷评估卡茨ADL指数评分(0 - 6分)、洛顿IADL量表(0 - 7分)以及自我感知的(I)ADL下降情况。使用基于锚定的方法评估MIC:(相对)平均变化得分;并使用分布方法:效应量(ES)、测量标准误(SEM)和0.5标准差。基于重测研究(间隔2周)和基于锚定的方法,使用SEM估计MDC。
卡茨ADL指数评分基于锚定的MIC为0.47分,而基于分布的MIC范围为0.18至0.47分。同样,洛顿IADL量表基于锚定的MIC在0.31至0.54分之间,基于分布的MIC范围为0.31至0.77分。MDC因样本量而异。为使MIC超过MDC,至少需要482名患者。
卡茨ADL指数和洛顿IADL量表的MIC均在半分左右。计算方法的差异降低了该结论的确定性。