Suppr超能文献

客观身体活动与胰岛素敏感性及循环脂肪因子谱的关联:弗雷明汉心脏研究

Associations of objective physical activity with insulin sensitivity and circulating adipokine profile: the Framingham Heart Study.

作者信息

Spartano N L, Stevenson M D, Xanthakis V, Larson M G, Andersson C, Murabito J M, Vasan R S

机构信息

Sections of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, and Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Obes. 2017 Apr;7(2):59-69. doi: 10.1111/cob.12177. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the relation of physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (SED) to insulin sensitivity and adipokines. We assessed PA and SED using Actical accelerometers and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in 2109 participants (free of type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus) from Framingham Generation 3 and Omni 2 cohorts (mean age 46 years, 54% women). Systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein [CRP]) and circulating adipokines were measured 6 years earlier. Steps per day, moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and SED per wear time (%SED) were predictor variables in multivariable regression analyses, with HOMA-IR, CRP and circulating adipokines as outcome measures. We reported that higher MVPA and more steps per day were associated with lower HOMA-IR, adjusting for %SED (β = -0.036, P = 0.002; β = -0.041, P = 0.005). Steps were inversely associated with CRP, but were directly associated with insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 levels (β = -0.111, P = 0.002; β = 3.293, P = 0.007). %SED was positively associated with HOMA-IR (β = 0.033, P < 0.0001), but non-significant after adjusting for MVPA (P = 0.13). %SED was associated with higher ratio of leptin/leptin receptor (sOB-R) and higher adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein (FABP)4 (β = 0.096, P < 0.0001; β = 0.593, P = 0.002). Our findings suggest differential influences of PA vs. SED on metabolic pathways, with PA modulating insulin resistance and inflammation, whereas SED influences FABPs.

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨身体活动(PA)和久坐时间(SED)与胰岛素敏感性及脂肪因子之间的关系。我们使用Actical加速度计评估了来自弗雷明汉第三代和Omni 2队列的2109名参与者(无1型和2型糖尿病)的PA和SED,并评估了胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)(平均年龄46岁,54%为女性)。6年前测量了全身炎症(C反应蛋白[CRP])和循环脂肪因子。在多变量回归分析中,每天步数、中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)和每次佩戴时间的久坐时间(%SED)为预测变量,以HOMA-IR、CRP和循环脂肪因子作为结局指标。我们报告称,调整%SED后,较高的MVPA和每天更多步数与较低的HOMA-IR相关(β=-0.036,P=0.002;β=-0.041,P=0.005)。步数与CRP呈负相关,但与胰岛素样生长因子(IGF)-1水平呈正相关(β=-0.111,P=0.002;β=3.293,P=0.007)。%SED与HOMA-IR呈正相关(β=0.033,P<0.0001),但调整MVPA后无统计学意义(P=0.13)。%SED与较高的瘦素/瘦素受体(sOB-R)比值和较高的脂肪细胞脂肪酸结合蛋白(FABP)4相关(β=0.096,P<0.0001;β=0.593,P=0.002)。我们的研究结果表明,PA与SED对代谢途径有不同影响,PA调节胰岛素抵抗和炎症,而SED影响FABP。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验