Snoad Christian, Nagel Corey, Bhattacharya Animesh, Thomas Evan
DelAgua Health, The Old Dairy, Marlborough, Wiltshire, United Kingdom.
OHSU/PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Apr;96(4):976-983. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0322. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
AbstractThe use of sanitary inspections combined with periodic water quality testing has been recommended in some cases as screening tools for fecal contamination. We conducted sanitary inspections and tested for thermotolerant coliforms (TTCs), a fecal indicator bacteria, among 7,317 unique water sources in West Bengal, India. Our results indicate that the sanitary inspection score has poor ability to identify TTC-contaminated sources. Among deep and shallow hand pumps, the area under curve (AUC) for prediction of TTC > 0 was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-0.61) and 0.58 (95% CI = 0.54-0.62), respectively, indicating that the sanitary inspection score was only marginally better than chance in discriminating between contaminated and uncontaminated sources of this type. A slightly higher AUC value of 0.64 (95% CI=0.57-0.71) was observed when the sanitary inspection score was used for prediction of TTC > 0 among the gravity-fed piped sources. Among unprotected springs (AUC = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.38-0.55) and unprotected dug wells (AUC = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.20-0.66), the sanitary inspection score performed more poorly than chance in discriminating between sites with TTC < 1 and TTC > 0. Aggregating over all source types, the sensitivity (true positive rate) of a high/very high sanitary inspection score for TTC contamination (TTC > 1 CFU/100 mL) was 29.4% and the specificity (true negative rate) was 77.9%, resulting in substantial misclassification of the sites when using the established risk categories. These findings suggest that sanitary surveys are inappropriate screening tools for identifying TTC contamination at water points.
摘要
在某些情况下,建议将卫生检查与定期水质检测结合起来作为粪便污染的筛查工具。我们在印度西孟加拉邦的7317个独特水源中进行了卫生检查,并检测了耐热大肠菌群(TTC),这是一种粪便指示菌。我们的结果表明,卫生检查评分识别受TTC污染水源的能力较差。在深、浅手压泵中,预测TTC>0的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.58(95%置信区间[CI]=0.53-0.61)和0.58(95%CI=0.54-0.62),这表明卫生检查评分在区分此类受污染和未受污染水源方面仅略优于随机猜测。当使用卫生检查评分预测重力供水管道水源中TTC>0时,观察到AUC值略高,为0.64(95%CI=0.57-0.71)。在无保护泉水(AUC=0.48,95%CI=0.38-0.55)和无保护挖井(AUC=0.41,95%CI=0.20-0.66)中,卫生检查评分在区分TTC<1和TTC>0的地点时表现比随机猜测更差。综合所有水源类型,卫生检查评分高/非常高对TTC污染(TTC>1 CFU/100 mL)的敏感性(真阳性率)为29.4%,特异性(真阴性率)为77.9%,使用既定风险类别时会导致大量地点分类错误。这些发现表明,卫生调查不是识别供水点TTC污染的合适筛查工具。