Hotz M M, Gnoinski W M, Nussbaumer H, Kistler E
Cleft Palate J. 1978 Oct;15(4):405-11.
Two samples of complete cleft cases between five and seven years of age are compared (11 UCLP + 9 BCLP versus 21 UCLP + 12 BCLP). The same early orthopedic procedures were applied to all cases, but surgical management differed for the two groups: "classical" surgery (lip 3 months, palate 2--2 1/2 years) versus delayed conservative surgery (lip 6 months, soft palate 18 months, hard palate 6--8 years). It is evident that early maxillary orthopedic treatment is of little consequence for long-term development unless concomitant surgery complies with growth and functional requirements. In contrast to "classical" surgery, palatal closure in two steps is more favourable to skeletal growth and does not interfere to any relevant degree with speech development.
对两组5至7岁的完全性腭裂病例样本进行比较(11例单侧完全性唇腭裂 + 9例双侧完全性唇腭裂 对比 21例单侧完全性唇腭裂 + 12例双侧完全性唇腭裂)。所有病例均采用相同的早期正畸治疗,但两组的手术治疗方式不同:“经典”手术(唇裂修复在3个月,腭裂修复在2至2.5岁)与延迟保守手术(唇裂修复在6个月,软腭裂修复在18个月,硬腭裂修复在6至8岁)。很明显,除非同期手术符合生长和功能需求,否则早期上颌正畸治疗对长期发育影响不大。与“经典”手术相比,分两步进行腭裂关闭对骨骼生长更有利,且在任何相关程度上都不会干扰语音发育。