• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱德华兹个人偏好量表常模与近期大学生样本的比较。

Comparison of Edwards Personal Preference Schedule Norms with Recent College Samples.

作者信息

Murgatroyd Dorothy, Gavurin Edward I

机构信息

a Herbert H. Lehman College of the City University of New York , USA.

出版信息

J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):71-76. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915799.

DOI:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915799
PMID:28136244
Abstract

Comparisons of the 15 major needs assessed by the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) were made between the original manual norms for college men and women published in 1959 and urban college men and women studied in 1973; between the means for Roman Catholic sisters published by Gardiner in 1973 and urban college women studied in 1973; between urban college men and urban college women studied in 1973; between urban college men and women studied in 1969 and urban college men and women studied in 1973. The major trends noted in the data were (a) a shift in the expressed needs of the sexes so that they were more nearly alike and (b) a similarity in the patterns of need changes for the sexes. It is suggested that these changes may be attributed to societal changes in the past decade.

摘要

对通过爱德华个人偏好量表(EPPS)评估的15项主要需求进行了比较,比较对象包括1959年公布的大学男女原始手册常模与1973年研究的城市大学男女;1973年加德纳公布的罗马天主教修女的均值与1973年研究的城市大学女性;1973年研究的城市大学男性与城市大学女性;1969年研究的城市大学男女与1973年研究的城市大学男女。数据中 noted 的主要趋势是:(a)两性表达的需求发生转变,使其更加接近;(b)两性需求变化模式相似。有人认为,这些变化可能归因于过去十年的社会变革。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Edwards Personal Preference Schedule Norms with Recent College Samples.爱德华兹个人偏好量表常模与近期大学生样本的比较。
J Psychol. 1975 Sep;91(1):71-76. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915799.
2
Manifest needs of prospective counselors: a comparative study.准咨询师的明显需求:一项比较研究。
J Psychol. 1991 Jan;125(1):101-8. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1991.10543275.
3
Performance of student nurses on the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.学生护士在爱德华个人偏好量表上的表现。
J Psychol. 1976 Nov;94(2d Half):297-300. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1976.9915849.
4
Factor structure of the Edwards personal preference schedule in a vocational rehabilitation sample.
J Clin Psychol. 1990 Jul;46(4):421-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199007)46:4<421::aid-jclp2270460408>3.0.co;2-i.
5
Self-other orientations and the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.自我与他人取向及爱德华个人偏好量表
J Pers Assess. 1975 Jun;39(3):293-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3903_11.
6
An assessment of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule from the perspective of the five-factor model.从五因素模型视角对爱德华个人偏好量表的评估
J Pers Assess. 1992 Feb;58(1):67-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_6.
7
Catholic sisters and the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.天主教修女与爱德华个人偏好量表
J Psychol. 1973 Sep;85(1st Half):97-100. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1973.9923867.
8
Comparison of manifest needs of nurses and physicians in primary care practice.
Nurs Res. 1978 Jul-Aug;27(4):255-9.
9
Why associate degree nursing students persist.为什么护理学副学士学位学生能坚持下来。
Nurs Res. 1975 Jan-Feb;24(1):57-9.
10
An empirical comparison of Maslow's and Murray's needs systems.马斯洛需求系统与默里需求系统的实证比较。
J Pers Assess. 1975 Dec;39(6):594-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3906_8.