Han Jeongwoo, Tao Ling, Wang Michael
Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439 USA.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Jan 24;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0698-z. eCollection 2017.
To reduce the environmental impacts of the aviation sector as air traffic grows steadily, the aviation industry has paid increasing attention to bio-based alternative jet fuels (AJFs), which may provide lower life-cycle petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than petroleum jet fuel. This study presents well-to-wake (WTWa) results for four emerging AJFs: ethanol-to-jet (ETJ) from corn and corn stover, and sugar-to-jet (STJ) from corn stover via both biological and catalytic conversion. For the ETJ pathways, two plant designs were examined: integrated (processing corn or corn stover as feedstock) and distributed (processing ethanol as feedstock). Also, three H options for STJ via catalytic conversion are investigated: external H from natural gas (NG) steam methane reforming (SMR), in situ H, and H from biomass gasification.
Results demonstrate that the feedstock is a key factor in the WTWa GHG emissions of ETJ: corn- and corn stover-based ETJ are estimated to produce WTWa GHG emissions that are 16 and 73%, respectively, less than those of petroleum jet. As for the STJ pathways, this study shows that STJ via biological conversion could generate WTWa GHG emissions 59% below those of petroleum jet. STJ via catalytic conversion could reduce the WTWa GHG emissions by 28% with H from NG SMR or 71% with H from biomass gasification than those of petroleum jet. This study also examines the impacts of co-product handling methods, and shows that the WTWa GHG emissions of corn stover-based ETJ, when estimated with a displacement method, are lower by 11 g COe/MJ than those estimated with an energy allocation method.
Corn- and corn stover-based ETJ as well as corn stover-based STJ show potentials to reduce WTWa GHG emissions compared to petroleum jet. Particularly, WTWa GHG emissions of STJ via catalytic conversion depend highly on the hydrogen source. On the other hand, ETJ offers unique opportunities to exploit extensive existing corn ethanol plants and infrastructure, and to provide a boost to staggering ethanol demand, which is largely being used as gasoline blendstock.
随着空中交通稳步增长,为减少航空业对环境的影响,航空业越来越关注生物基替代喷气燃料(AJF),与石油喷气燃料相比,它可能会降低生命周期内的石油消耗和温室气体(GHG)排放。本研究给出了四种新兴AJF从原料到尾迹(WTWa)的结果:由玉米和玉米秸秆制成的乙醇制喷气燃料(ETJ),以及通过生物和催化转化由玉米秸秆制成的糖制喷气燃料(STJ)。对于ETJ路径,研究了两种工厂设计:综合型(以玉米或玉米秸秆为原料进行加工)和分布式(以乙醇为原料进行加工)。此外,还研究了通过催化转化生产STJ的三种氢源选项:来自天然气(NG)蒸汽甲烷重整(SMR)的外部氢、原位氢以及来自生物质气化的氢。
结果表明,原料是ETJ的WTWa温室气体排放的关键因素:以玉米和玉米秸秆为原料的ETJ估计产生的WTWa温室气体排放分别比石油喷气燃料低16%和73%。至于STJ路径,本研究表明,通过生物转化的STJ产生的WTWa温室气体排放比石油喷气燃料低59%。与石油喷气燃料相比,通过催化转化的STJ使用来自NG SMR的氢可将WTWa温室气体排放降低28%,使用来自生物质气化的氢可降低71%。本研究还考察了副产品处理方法的影响,结果表明,采用替代法估算时,以玉米秸秆为原料的ETJ的WTWa温室气体排放比采用能量分配法估算的结果低11克二氧化碳当量/兆焦。
与石油喷气燃料相比,以玉米和玉米秸秆为原料的ETJ以及以玉米秸秆为原料的STJ显示出降低WTWa温室气体排放的潜力。特别是,通过催化转化的STJ的WTWa温室气体排放高度依赖于氢源。另一方面,ETJ提供了独特的机会来利用广泛存在的现有玉米乙醇工厂和基础设施,并推动目前大量用作汽油调合组分、需求惊人的乙醇的使用。