Wang Zhichao, Dunn Jennifer B, Han Jeongwoo, Wang Michael Q
EcoEngineers, 300 East Locust Street, Des Moines, IA 50309 USA.
Systems Assessment Group, Energy System Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439 USA.
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015 Nov 4;8:178. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0350-8. eCollection 2015.
Corn oil recovery and conversion to biodiesel has been widely adopted at corn ethanol plants recently. The US EPA has projected 2.6 billion liters of biodiesel will be produced from corn oil in 2022. Corn oil biodiesel may qualify for federal renewable identification number (RIN) credits under the Renewable Fuel Standard, as well as for low greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity credits under California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Because multiple products [ethanol, biodiesel, and distiller's grain with solubles (DGS)] are produced from one feedstock (corn), however, a careful co-product treatment approach is required to accurately estimate GHG intensities of both ethanol and corn oil biodiesel and to avoid double counting of benefits associated with corn oil biodiesel production.
This study develops four co-product treatment methods: (1) displacement, (2) marginal, (3) hybrid allocation, and (4) process-level energy allocation. Life-cycle GHG emissions for corn oil biodiesel were more sensitive to the choice of co-product allocation method because significantly less corn oil biodiesel is produced than corn ethanol at a dry mill. Corn ethanol life-cycle GHG emissions with the displacement, marginal, and hybrid allocation approaches are similar (61, 62, and 59 g CO2e/MJ, respectively). Although corn ethanol and DGS share upstream farming and conversion burdens in both the hybrid and process-level energy allocation methods, DGS bears a higher burden in the latter because it has lower energy content per selling price as compared to corn ethanol. As a result, with the process-level allocation approach, ethanol's life-cycle GHG emissions are lower at 46 g CO2e/MJ. Corn oil biodiesel life-cycle GHG emissions from the marginal, hybrid allocation, and process-level energy allocation methods were 14, 59, and 45 g CO2e/MJ, respectively. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the influence corn oil yield, soy biodiesel, and defatted DGS displacement credits, and energy consumption for corn oil production and corn oil biodiesel production.
This study's results demonstrate that co-product treatment methodology strongly influences corn oil biodiesel life-cycle GHG emissions and can affect how this fuel is treated under the Renewable Fuel and Low Carbon Fuel Standards.
玉米油回收并转化为生物柴油最近在玉米乙醇工厂中已被广泛采用。美国环境保护局预计2022年将从玉米油生产26亿升生物柴油。玉米油生物柴油可能符合可再生燃料标准下的联邦可再生识别号(RIN)信用额度,以及加利福尼亚州低碳燃料标准下的低温室气体(GHG)排放强度信用额度。然而,由于多种产品[乙醇、生物柴油和含可溶物的酒糟(DGS)]由一种原料(玉米)生产,因此需要一种谨慎的副产品处理方法,以准确估计乙醇和玉米油生物柴油的温室气体强度,并避免与玉米油生物柴油生产相关的效益重复计算。
本研究开发了四种副产品处理方法:(1)替代法、(2)边际法、(3)混合分配法和(4)过程级能量分配法。玉米油生物柴油的生命周期温室气体排放对副产品分配方法的选择更为敏感,因为在干磨厂生产的玉米油生物柴油比玉米乙醇少得多。采用替代法、边际法和混合分配法时,玉米乙醇生命周期温室气体排放相似(分别为61、62和59克二氧化碳当量/兆焦)。尽管在混合分配法和过程级能量分配法中,玉米乙醇和DGS分担上游种植和转化负担,但在后者中DGS承担的负担更高,因为与玉米乙醇相比,其每售价的能量含量较低。因此,采用过程级分配法时,乙醇的生命周期温室气体排放较低,为46克二氧化碳当量/兆焦。边际法、混合分配法和过程级能量分配法得出的玉米油生物柴油生命周期温室气体排放分别为14、59和45克二氧化碳当量/兆焦。进行了敏感性分析,以研究玉米油产量、大豆生物柴油和脱脂DGS替代信用额度,以及玉米油生产和玉米油生物柴油生产的能源消耗的影响。
本研究结果表明,副产品处理方法对玉米油生物柴油生命周期温室气体排放有很大影响,并可能影响该燃料在可再生燃料和低碳燃料标准下的处理方式。