Systems Assessment Group, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, IL 60439, United States.
Bioresour Technol. 2013 Dec;150:447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.153. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
Well-to-wake (WTWa) analysis of bio-based aviation fuels, including hydroprocessed renewable jet (HRJ) from various oil seeds, Fischer-Tropsch jet (FTJ) from corn-stover and co-feeding of coal and corn-stover, and pyrolysis jet from corn stover, is conducted and compared with petroleum jet. WTWa GHG emission reductions relative to petroleum jet can be 41-63% for HRJ, 68-76% for pyrolysis jet and 89% for FTJ from corn stover. The HRJ production stage dominates WTWa GHG emissions from HRJ pathways. The differences in GHG emissions from HRJ production stage among considered feedstocks are much smaller than those from fertilizer use and N2O emissions related to feedstock collection stage. Sensitivity analyses on FTJ production from coal and corn-stover are also conducted, showing the importance of biomass share in the feedstock, carbon capture and sequestration options, and overall efficiency. For both HRJ and FTJ, co-product handling methods have significant impacts on WTWa results.
对生物基航空燃料的从睡眠到觉醒(WTWa)分析,包括来自各种油籽的加氢可再生喷气燃料(HRJ)、来自玉米秸秆的费托喷气燃料(FTJ)和煤与玉米秸秆共进料、以及来自玉米秸秆的热解喷气燃料,与石油喷气燃料进行了比较。与石油喷气燃料相比,HRJ 的 WTWa 温室气体减排量为 41-63%,热解喷气燃料为 68-76%,来自玉米秸秆的 FTJ 为 89%。HRJ 生产阶段主导 HRJ 途径的 WTWa 温室气体排放。考虑到原料的肥料使用和与原料收集阶段相关的 N2O 排放,HRJ 生产阶段温室气体排放的差异远小于原料之间的差异。还对煤和玉米秸秆生产 FTJ 进行了敏感性分析,表明生物质在原料中的份额、碳捕获和封存选择以及整体效率的重要性。对于 HRJ 和 FTJ,副产品处理方法对 WTWa 的结果有重大影响。