Mermutluoglu Cigdem, Deveci Ozcan, Dayan Saim, Aslan Emel, Bozkurt Fatma, Tekin Recep
Clinic of Infectious diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Diyarbakır Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Department of Infectious diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Eurasian J Med. 2016 Oct;48(3):199-203. doi: 10.5152/eurasianmed.2016.0021.
This study aimed to investigate the antifungal susceptibility, typology, and risk factors of candidemia among adult and pediatric inpatients at a university hospital.
A case-control study was designed, and data collected between December 2013 and December 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. The case group consisted of patients with candidemia. The control group was selected from the inpatients that did not develop candidemia but were admitted in the same clinic and during the same period as the candidemia group. The diagnosis of candidemia was based on a compatible clinical picture and positive blood culture of Candida spp. The demographic characteristics, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, comorbidities, use of invasive devices, antibiotics administered, and duration of antibiotic uses were compared between both the groups.
Out of the 84 patients, 42 (50%) were included in the case group, and the remaining 42 (50%) were included in the control group. Out of all the patients, 31 (36.9%) were female, and 53 (63.1%) were male. When the clinical findings of the case and control groups were compared, the prevalence of nosocomial infections, sepsis, candiduria, and fever was statistically significantly higher in the case group. Among the isolated group in the study, 22 (52.4%) were identified as C. albicans, while the others were non-albicans Candida strains. The C. albicans strain (4.5%) was resistant to fluconazole, while 7 among the non-albicans Candida strains (35%) were resistant to fluconazole. In the case group, abdominal surgery, CVP catheter presence, TPN, endotracheal intubation, frequency of blood transfusion, and SOFA scores were significantly higher than the control groups. The logistic regression test demonstrated that TPN and blood transfusion are the most important risk factors for candidemia (OR=8.14 and OR=5.96, respectively).
The invasive Candida infections continue to be a major health problem in Turkey and in our hospital. Particularly, it was observed that it is important to perform invasive procedures, antibiotic administration and parenteral nutrition carefully in patients hospitalized in the ICU.
本研究旨在调查某大学医院成年和儿科住院患者念珠菌血症的抗真菌药敏性、类型及危险因素。
设计一项病例对照研究,对2013年12月至2014年12月期间收集的数据进行回顾性评估。病例组由念珠菌血症患者组成。对照组从未发生念珠菌血症但在与念珠菌血症组相同科室且同期入院的住院患者中选取。念珠菌血症的诊断基于相符的临床表现及念珠菌属血培养阳性。比较两组患者的人口统计学特征、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、合并症、侵入性装置的使用、使用的抗生素及抗生素使用时长。
84例患者中,42例(50%)纳入病例组,其余42例(50%)纳入对照组。所有患者中,31例(36.9%)为女性,53例(63.1%)为男性。比较病例组和对照组的临床发现,病例组医院感染、脓毒症、念珠菌尿症和发热的患病率在统计学上显著更高。在研究的分离菌株组中,22例(52.4%)被鉴定为白色念珠菌,其他为非白色念珠菌菌株。白色念珠菌菌株(4.5%)对氟康唑耐药,而非白色念珠菌菌株中有7例(35%)对氟康唑耐药。病例组的腹部手术、中心静脉压导管置入、全胃肠外营养(TPN)、气管插管、输血频率和SOFA评分显著高于对照组。逻辑回归检验表明,TPN和输血是念珠菌血症最重要的危险因素(OR分别为8.14和5.96)。
侵袭性念珠菌感染在土耳其及我们医院仍然是一个主要的健康问题。特别是,观察到在重症监护病房住院的患者中,谨慎进行侵入性操作、使用抗生素和肠外营养非常重要。