Beatty Lisa, Kemp Emma, Binnion Claire, Turner Jane, Milne Donna, Butow Phyllis, Lambert Sylvie, Yates Patsy, Yip Desmond, Koczwara Bogda
School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, South Australia, Australia.
School of Medicine, Mental Health Centre, University of Queensland, K Floor, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jun;25(6):1905-1914. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3591-1. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
While online interventions are increasingly explored as an alternative to therapist-based interventions for cancer-related distress, limitations to efficacy potentially include low uptake and adherence. Few predictors of uptake or adherence to online interventions have been consistently identified, particularly in individuals with cancer. This study examined rates and predictors of uptake and adherence to Finding My Way, a RCT of an online intervention versus an information-only online control for cancer-related distress.
Participants were adults with cancer treated with curative intent. Adherence was assessed by login frequency, duration and activity level; analyses examined demographic, medical and psychological predictors of uptake and adherence.
The study enrolled 191 adults (aged 26-94 years) undergoing active treatment for cancer of any type. Uptake was highest for females and for individuals with ovarian (80%) and breast cancer (49.8%), and lowest for those with melanoma (26.5%). Adherence was predicted by older age and control-group allocation. Baseline distress levels did not predict adherence. High adherers to the full intervention had better emotion regulation and quality of life than low adherers.
Uptake of online intervention varies according to age, gender and cancer type. While uptake was higher amongst younger individuals, once enrolled, older individuals were more likely to adhere to online interventions for cancer-related distress.
虽然在线干预作为基于治疗师的癌症相关困扰干预的替代方案越来越多地被探索,但疗效的局限性可能包括低接受率和低依从性。很少有一致确定的在线干预接受率或依从性的预测因素,尤其是在癌症患者中。本研究调查了“找到我的路”(Finding My Way)在线干预与仅提供信息的在线对照用于癌症相关困扰的随机对照试验的接受率和依从率及预测因素。
参与者为接受根治性治疗的成年癌症患者。通过登录频率、时长和活动水平评估依从性;分析考察了接受率和依从性的人口统计学、医学和心理预测因素。
该研究招募了191名正在接受任何类型癌症积极治疗的成年人(年龄在26 - 94岁之间)。女性以及卵巢癌患者(80%)和乳腺癌患者(49.8%)的接受率最高,黑色素瘤患者的接受率最低(26.5%)。年龄较大和被分配到对照组可预测依从性。基线困扰水平不能预测依从性。完全参与干预的高依从者比低依从者具有更好的情绪调节能力和生活质量。
在线干预的接受率因年龄、性别和癌症类型而异。虽然年轻人的接受率较高,但一旦参与,老年人更有可能坚持进行癌症相关困扰的在线干预。