Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States.
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Feb;60:7-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
Randomized control trials (RCTs) have long been the gold standard for allowing causal inferences to be made regarding the efficacy of a treatment under investigation, but traditional RCT data analysis perspectives do not take into account a common reality: imperfect participant compliance to treatment. Recent advances in both maximum likelihood parameter estimation and mixture modeling methodology have enabled treatment effects to be estimated, in the presence of less than ideal levels of participant compliance, via a Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) structural equation mixture model. CACE is described in contrast to "intent to treat" (ITT), "per protocol", and "as treated" RCT data analysis perspectives. CACE model assumptions, specification, estimation, and interpretation will all be demonstrated with simulated data generated from a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy for Juvenile Fibromyalgia. CACE analysis model figures, linear model equations, and Mplus estimation syntax examples are all provided. Data needed to reproduce analyses in this article are available as supplemental materials (online only) in the Appendix of this article.
随机对照试验(RCT)长期以来一直是评估研究中治疗效果的因果推断的黄金标准,但传统的 RCT 数据分析视角并未考虑到一个常见的现实:参与者对治疗的依从性不完美。最近在最大似然参数估计和混合建模方法方面的进展使得在参与者依从性低于理想水平的情况下,通过遵从平均因果效应(CACE)结构方程混合模型来估计治疗效果成为可能。CACE 与“意向治疗”(ITT)、“方案内”和“实际治疗”RCT 数据分析视角进行了对比。将使用从认知行为治疗青少年纤维肌痛的随机对照试验中生成的模拟数据演示 CACE 模型假设、规范、估计和解释。还提供了 CACE 分析模型图、线性模型方程和 Mplus 估计语法示例。本文分析所需的数据可作为本文附录的补充材料(仅限在线)提供。