• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国放射研究人员对低剂量辐射风险的认知

Perception of low dose radiation risks among radiation researchers in Korea.

作者信息

Seong Ki Moon, Kwon TaeWoo, Seo Songwon, Lee Dalnim, Park Sunhoo, Jin Young Woo, Lee Seung-Sook

机构信息

Laboratory of Low Dose Risk Assessment, National Radiation Emergency Medical Center, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.

Departments of Pathology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Feb 6;12(2):e0171777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171777. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0171777
PMID:28166286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5293274/
Abstract

Expert's risk evaluation of radiation exposure strongly influences the public's risk perception. Experts can inform laypersons of significant radiation information including health knowledge based on experimental data. However, some experts' radiation risk perception is often based on non-conclusive scientific evidence (i.e., radiation levels below 100 millisievert), which is currently under debate. Examining perception levels among experts is important for communication with the public since these individual's opinions have often exacerbated the public's confusion. We conducted a survey of Korean radiation researchers to investigate their perceptions of the risks associated with radiation exposure below 100 millisievert. A linear regression analysis revealed that having ≥ 11 years' research experience was a critical factor associated with radiation risk perception, which was inversely correlated with each other. Increased opportunities to understand radiation effects at < 100 millisievert could alter the public's risk perception of radiation exposure. In addition, radiation researchers conceived that more scientific evidence reducing the uncertainty for radiation effects < 100 millisievert is necessary for successful public communication. We concluded that sustained education addressing scientific findings is a critical attribute that will affect the risk perception of radiation exposure.

摘要

专家对辐射暴露的风险评估极大地影响着公众的风险认知。专家可以根据实验数据,向非专业人士提供包括健康知识在内的重要辐射信息。然而,一些专家的辐射风险认知往往基于尚无定论的科学证据(即辐射水平低于100毫西弗),目前这一证据仍存在争议。鉴于这些专家的观点常常加剧公众的困惑,考察专家的认知水平对于与公众沟通至关重要。我们对韩国辐射研究人员进行了一项调查,以探究他们对低于100毫西弗的辐射暴露相关风险的认知。线性回归分析表明,拥有≥11年的研究经验是与辐射风险认知相关的一个关键因素,二者呈负相关。增加了解低于100毫西弗辐射效应的机会可能会改变公众对辐射暴露的风险认知。此外,辐射研究人员认为,为成功开展公众沟通,需要更多减少低于100毫西弗辐射效应不确定性的科学证据。我们得出结论,持续开展关于科学发现的教育是影响辐射暴露风险认知的一个关键因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a798/5293274/8ed7d6b556ef/pone.0171777.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a798/5293274/8ed7d6b556ef/pone.0171777.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a798/5293274/8ed7d6b556ef/pone.0171777.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Perception of low dose radiation risks among radiation researchers in Korea.韩国放射研究人员对低剂量辐射风险的认知
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 6;12(2):e0171777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171777. eCollection 2017.
2
Factors associated with the risk perception and purchase decisions of Fukushima-related food in South Korea.韩国与福岛相关食品风险认知及购买决策相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0187655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187655. eCollection 2017.
3
Projected lifetime cancer risks from occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic medical radiation workers in South Korea.韩国诊断医疗辐射工作者职业辐射暴露的预期终生癌症风险。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):1206. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5107-x.
4
Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys.信任对中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)在韩国爆发期间作为情感和认知维度的两种不同风险感知的影响:连续横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 4;10(3):e033026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033026.
5
Semi-quantitative assessment of disease risks at the human, livestock, wildlife interface for the Republic of Korea using a nationwide survey of experts: A model for other countries.使用全国专家调查对韩国在人类、牲畜和野生动物界面的疾病风险进行半定量评估:为其他国家提供的模型。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Feb;65(1):e155-e164. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12705. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Effective patient education in medical imaging: public perceptions of radiation exposure risk.医学成像中的有效患者教育:公众对辐射暴露风险的认知。
J Allied Health. 2002 Fall;31(3):159-64.
7
Occupational radiation exposure and its health effects on interventional medical workers: study protocol for a prospective cohort study.职业性辐射暴露及其对介入医疗工作者的健康影响:一项前瞻性队列研究的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 15;7(12):e018333. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018333.
8
Spatial distribution of the public's risk perception for air pollution: A nationwide study in China.公众对空气污染风险感知的空间分布:中国全国性研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 10;655:454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.232. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
9
Perception of medical radiation risk in Ireland: Results of a public survey.爱尔兰民众对医疗辐射风险的认知:一项公众调查的结果。
Phys Med. 2019 Dec;68:96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.033. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
10
Occupational radiation exposure and morbidity of circulatory disease among diagnostic medical radiation workers in South Korea.韩国诊断医疗辐射工作者的职业辐射暴露与循环系统疾病发病情况。
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Nov;77(11):752-760. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106326. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Current Safety Regulation for Radiation Emergency Medicine in Korea.韩国辐射急诊医学的现行安全规定。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 26;18(23):12434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312434.
2
Assessment of an Emergency Medicine System for Radiation Accidents in Korea: A State Survey of the Workers Involved the Medical Response to Radiation Accidents.韩国辐射事故应急医学系统评估:对参与辐射事故医疗响应的工作人员的国家调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 2;18(5):2458. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052458.
3
[The effect of low dose ionizing radiation exposure on dynamic thiol-disulfide homeostasis and ischemia modified albumin levels: an observational study].

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology Without Biology: False Paradigms, Unfounded Assumptions, and Specious Statistics in Radiation Science (with Commentaries by Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake and Christopher Busby and a Reply by the Authors).没有生物学的流行病学:辐射科学中的错误范式、无端假设和似是而非的统计数据(英格·施密茨 - 费尔哈克和克里斯托弗·巴斯比的评论及作者的回应)
Biol Theory. 2016;11:69-101. doi: 10.1007/s13752-016-0244-4. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
2
Lay public mental models of ionizing radiation: representations and risk perception in four European countries.欧洲四个国家公众对电离辐射的心理模型:表征与风险认知
J Radiol Prot. 2016 Jun;36(2):S102-S121. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/2/S102. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
3
低剂量电离辐射暴露对动态巯基-二硫键稳态及缺血修饰白蛋白水平的影响:一项观察性研究
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 May-Jun;70(3):233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Performance of sparse-view CT reconstruction with multi-directional gradient operators.基于多方向梯度算子的稀疏视角 CT 重建性能。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0209674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209674. eCollection 2019.
Perception of Radiation Risk by Japanese Radiation Specialists Evaluated as a Safe Dose Before the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
日本放射专家对辐射风险的认知在福岛核事故前被评估为安全剂量。
Health Phys. 2016 Jun;110(6):558-62. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000486.
4
Epidemiological research on radiation-induced cancer in atomic bomb survivors.原子弹爆炸幸存者中辐射诱发癌症的流行病学研究。
J Radiat Res. 2016 Aug;57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i112-i117. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw005. Epub 2016 Mar 13.
5
The Radiation Problem and Its Solution from a Health Communication Perspective.从健康传播视角看辐射问题及其解决方案
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Feb;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S88-98. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.S1.S88. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
Ionising radiation and risk of death from leukaemia and lymphoma in radiation-monitored workers (INWORKS): an international cohort study.辐射监测工作人员的电离辐射与白血病和淋巴瘤死亡风险(INWORKS):一项国际队列研究
Lancet Haematol. 2015 Jul;2(7):e276-81. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00094-0.
7
Long-term effects of radiation exposure on health.长期辐射暴露对健康的影响。
Lancet. 2015 Aug 1;386(9992):469-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61167-9.
8
Emotional consequences of nuclear power plant disasters.核电站灾难的情绪后果。
Health Phys. 2014 Feb;106(2):206-10. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000012.
9
Radiation risk perception: a discrepancy between the experts and the general population.辐射风险感知:专家与公众之间的差异。
J Environ Radioact. 2014 Jul;133:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 May 15.
10
Radiation biology and radiation protection.放射生物学与辐射防护
Ann ICRP. 2012 Oct-Dec;41(3-4):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Aug 22.