• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信任对中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)在韩国爆发期间作为情感和认知维度的两种不同风险感知的影响:连续横断面调查。

Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys.

机构信息

Health Review and Assessment Committee, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju, South Korea.

Division of Suicide Prevention Policy, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Sejong, South Korea.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 4;10(3):e033026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033026.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033026
PMID:32139484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7059523/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the affective and cognitive risk perceptions in the general population of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) during the 2015 MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea and the influencing factors.

DESIGN

Serial cross-sectional design with four consecutive surveys.

SETTING

Nationwide general population in South Korea.

PARTICIPANTS

Overall 4010 respondents (aged 19 years and over) from the general population during the MERS-CoV epidemic were included.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were (1) affective risk perception, (2) cognitive risk perception, and (3) trust in the government. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors (demographic, socioeconomic, area and political orientation) associated with risk perceptions.

RESULTS

Both affective and cognitive risk perceptions decreased as the MERS-CoV epidemic progressed. Proportions of affective risk perception were higher in all surveys and slowly decreased compared with cognitive risk perception over time. Females (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.72-2.00; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.86) and lower self-reported household economic status respondents were more likely to perceive the affective risk. The older the adults, the higher the affective risk perception, but the lower the cognitive risk perception compared with younger adults. The respondents who had low trust in the government had higher affective (aOR 2.19-3.11; 95 CI 1.44 to 4.67) and cognitive (aOR 3.55-5.41; 95 CI 1.44 to 9.01) risk perceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that even if cognitive risk perception is dissolved, affective risk perception can continue during MERS-CoV epidemic. Risk perception associating factors (ie, gender, age and self-reported household economic status) appear to be noticeably different between affective and cognitive dimensions. It also indicates that trust in the government influences affective risk perception and cognitive risk perception. There is a need for further efforts to understand the mechanism regarding the general public's risk perception for effective risk communication.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估中东呼吸综合征(MERS)期间韩国 2015 年中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)爆发期间普通人群的情感和认知风险感知,以及影响因素。

设计

连续四次调查的横断面研究。

地点

韩国全国普通人群。

参与者

在 MERS-CoV 流行期间,共纳入来自普通人群的 4010 名年龄在 19 岁及以上的受访者。

主要和次要结果测量

主要结局指标为(1)情感风险感知,(2)认知风险感知,(3)对政府的信任。使用多变量逻辑回归模型确定与风险感知相关的因素(人口统计学、社会经济、地区和政治倾向)。

结果

随着 MERS-CoV 疫情的发展,情感和认知风险感知均降低。在所有调查中,情感风险感知的比例均较高,且随着时间的推移,与认知风险感知相比,其比例缓慢下降。女性(调整后的比值比(aOR)1.72-2.00;95%置信区间 1.14 至 2.86)和报告家庭经济状况较低的受访者更有可能感知到情感风险。成年人年龄越大,情感风险感知越高,但与年轻成年人相比,认知风险感知越低。对政府信任度低的受访者对情感(aOR 2.19-3.11;95%置信区间 1.44 至 4.67)和认知(aOR 3.55-5.41;95%置信区间 1.44 至 9.01)风险感知更高。

结论

本研究表明,即使认知风险感知消失,MERS-CoV 疫情期间仍可能继续出现情感风险感知。风险感知关联因素(即性别、年龄和自我报告的家庭经济状况)在情感和认知维度之间似乎明显不同。这也表明对政府的信任会影响情感风险感知和认知风险感知。需要进一步努力,以了解公众对有效风险沟通的风险感知机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b7/7059523/d9288d7df9b3/bmjopen-2019-033026f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b7/7059523/d9288d7df9b3/bmjopen-2019-033026f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b7/7059523/d9288d7df9b3/bmjopen-2019-033026f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys.信任对中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)在韩国爆发期间作为情感和认知维度的两种不同风险感知的影响:连续横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 4;10(3):e033026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033026.
2
Preventive Behavioral Responses to the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Outbreak in Korea.韩国 2015 年中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒爆发的预防性行为反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 18;16(12):2161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122161.
3
Worry experienced during the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) pandemic in Korea.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征(MERS)疫情期间所经历的担忧。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173234. eCollection 2017.
4
Social Distancing and Transmission-reducing Practices during the 2019 Coronavirus Disease and 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Outbreaks in Korea.韩国 2019 年冠状病毒病和 2015 年中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒爆发期间的社交距离和降低传播实践。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jun 15;35(23):e220. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e220.
5
Middle East respiratory syndrome in South Korea during 2015: Risk-related perceptions and quarantine attitudes.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征:风险相关认知与隔离态度
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Nov 1;44(11):1414-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
6
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea, 2015: epidemiology, characteristics and public health implications.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)疫情:流行病学、特征及对公共卫生的影响
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Feb;95(2):207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
7
Factors Influencing Emergency Nurses' Burnout During an Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus in Korea.韩国中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒爆发期间影响急诊护士职业倦怠的因素
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2016 Dec;10(4):295-299. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Healthcare Workers Emotions, Perceived Stressors and Coping Strategies During a MERS-CoV Outbreak.中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒疫情期间医护人员的情绪、感知压力源及应对策略
Clin Med Res. 2016 Mar;14(1):7-14. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2016.1303. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Factors influencing preventive behavior against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus among nursing students in South Korea.影响韩国护理专业学生针对中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒预防行为的因素。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:168-72. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
10
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus epidemic impact on healthcare workers' risk perceptions, work and personal lives.中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒疫情对医护人员风险认知、工作及个人生活的影响。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2019 Oct 31;13(10):920-926. doi: 10.3855/jidc.11753.

引用本文的文献

1
Interacting particle models on the impact of spatially heterogeneous human behavioral factors on dynamics of infectious diseases.相互作用粒子模型研究空间异质的人类行为因素对传染病动力学的影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Aug 8;20(8):e1012345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012345. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Association Between Risk Perceptions of COVID-19, Political Ideology, and Mask-Wearing Behavior After the Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Survey in South Korea.新冠疫情爆发后,对新冠病毒的风险认知、政治意识形态与戴口罩行为之间的关联:韩国的一项横断面调查
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jun 20;17:1659-1668. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S463739. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature.信任与风险感知:文献综述
Risk Anal. 2021 Mar;41(3):480-490. doi: 10.1111/risa.13325. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Institutional trust and misinformation in the response to the 2018-19 Ebola outbreak in North Kivu, DR Congo: a population-based survey.在应对 2018-19 年刚果民主共和国北基伍埃博拉疫情中的机构信任和错误信息:一项基于人群的调查。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 May;19(5):529-536. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30063-5. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
3
Residential Location and Psychological Distance in Americans' Risk Views and Behavioral Intentions Regarding Zika Virus.
The association between the risk perceptions of COVID-19, trust in the government, political ideologies, and socio-demographic factors: A year-long cross-sectional study in South Korea.
新冠病毒风险认知、对政府的信任、政治意识形态与社会人口因素之间的关联:韩国为期一年的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 21;18(6):e0280779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280779. eCollection 2023.
4
Three dimensions of COVID-19 risk perceptions and their socioeconomic correlates in the United States: A social media analysis.美国 COVID-19 风险认知的三个维度及其社会经济相关性:社交媒体分析。
Risk Anal. 2023 Jun;43(6):1174-1186. doi: 10.1111/risa.13993. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Association Between Self-Rated Political Orientation and Attitude Toward the Cash Transfer Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Conducted in South Korea.自评政治倾向与对 COVID-19 大流行期间现金转移政策的态度之间的关联:在韩国进行的全国性横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 17;10:887201. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.887201. eCollection 2022.
6
Whistling Through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Optimism Bias and Political Beliefs in the United States.在新冠疫情中呼啸而过:美国的乐观偏差与政治信仰
Am Polit Res. 2022 May;50(3):396-415. doi: 10.1177/1532673X211055043.
7
Political Ideologies, Government Trust, and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Survey.政治意识形态、政府信任与韩国的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:一项横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010655.
8
Gender Differences in Fear and Risk Perception During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间恐惧与风险认知中的性别差异
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 5;12:689467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689467. eCollection 2021.
9
Correlates of intended COVID-19 vaccine acceptance across time and countries: results from a series of cross-sectional surveys.不同时间和国家 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿的相关因素:一系列横断面调查的结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 2;11(8):e048025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048025.
10
Attachment, Personality and Locus of Control: Psychological Determinants of Risk Perception and Preventive Behaviors for COVID-19.依恋、人格与控制点:COVID-19风险认知和预防行为的心理决定因素
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 9;12:634012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634012. eCollection 2021.
美国人对寨卡病毒风险看法和行为意图的居住地点和心理距离。
Risk Anal. 2018 Dec;38(12):2561-2579. doi: 10.1111/risa.13184. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
4
Exploring the Determinants of Perceived Risk of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) in Korea.探究韩国民众对中东呼吸综合征(MERS)感知风险的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 4;15(6):1168. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061168.
5
The role of risk perception in willingness to respond to the 2014-2016 West African Ebola outbreak: a qualitative study of international health care workers.风险认知在应对2014 - 2016年西非埃博拉疫情意愿中的作用:一项针对国际医护人员的定性研究
Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Aug 7;2:21. doi: 10.1186/s41256-017-0042-y. eCollection 2017.
6
Middle East respiratory syndrome risk perception among students at a university in South Korea, 2015.2015年韩国某大学学生对中东呼吸综合征的风险认知
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Jun 1;45(6):e53-e60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
7
Worry experienced during the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) pandemic in Korea.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征(MERS)疫情期间所经历的担忧。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173234. eCollection 2017.
8
Preventive behaviors by the level of perceived infection sensitivity during the Korea outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2015.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征疫情期间按感知感染敏感性水平划分的预防行为
Epidemiol Health. 2016 Nov 16;38:e2016051. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2016051. eCollection 2016.
9
Middle East respiratory syndrome in South Korea during 2015: Risk-related perceptions and quarantine attitudes.2015年韩国中东呼吸综合征:风险相关认知与隔离态度
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Nov 1;44(11):1414-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
10
Knowledge and risk perceptions of the Ebola virus in the United States.美国对埃博拉病毒的认知与风险感知
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Apr 16;2:262-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.04.005. eCollection 2015.