Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Education, Psychology, and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Italy; Research and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Education, Psychology, and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Italy.
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;74:162-172. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) are a cardinal characteristic of psychosis. Recent research on the neuropsychological mechanism of AVHs has focused on source monitoring failure, but a few studies have suggested the involvement of attention, working memory, processing speed, verbal learning, memory, and executive functions. In this study we examined the neuropsychological profile of patients with AVHs, assuming that the mechanism underlying this symptom could be a dysfunction of specific cognitive domains.
A large neuropsychological battery including set-shifting, working memory, processing speed, attention, fluency, verbal learning and memory, and executive functions was administered to 90 patients with psychotic disorders and 44 healthy controls. The group of patients was divided into two groups: 46 patients with AVHs in the current episode and 44 who denied auditory hallucinations or other modalities in the current episode. AVHs were assessed with the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales (PSYRATS); the Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale was used to measure long-term propensity to auditory verbal hallucination-like experiences (HLEs) in the sample.
Patients showed poorer performances on all neuropsychological measures compared to the healthy controls' group. In the original dataset without missing data (n=58), patients with AVHs (n=29) presented poorer set shifting and verbal learning, higher levels of visual attention, and marginally significant poorer semantic fluency compared to patients without AVHs (n=29). In the logistic model on the multiple imputed dataset (n=90, 100 imputed datasets), lower capacity of set shifting and semantic fluency distinguished patients with AVHs from those without them.
Patients experiencing persistent AVHs might fail to shift their attention away from the voices; poorer semantic fluency could be a secondary deficit of set-shifting failure.
听觉言语幻觉(AVHs)是精神病的一个主要特征。最近对 AVHs 的神经心理学机制的研究集中在源监测失败上,但有一些研究表明注意力、工作记忆、处理速度、言语学习、记忆和执行功能也参与其中。在这项研究中,我们检查了有 AVHs 的患者的神经心理学特征,假设这种症状的潜在机制可能是特定认知领域的功能障碍。
我们对 90 名精神病患者和 44 名健康对照者进行了大量的神经心理学测试,包括转换能力、工作记忆、处理速度、注意力、流畅性、言语学习和记忆以及执行功能。患者组分为两组:46 名当前发作有 AVHs 的患者和 44 名当前发作无听觉幻觉或其他幻觉的患者。使用精神病症状评定量表(PSYRATS)评估 AVHs;使用 Launay-Slade 幻觉量表评估样本中长期出现听觉言语幻觉样体验(HLE)的倾向。
与健康对照组相比,患者在所有神经心理学测试中的表现都较差。在原始无缺失数据的数据集(n=58)中,有 AVHs 的患者(n=29)的转换能力和言语学习能力较差,视觉注意力水平较高,语义流畅性稍差,与无 AVHs 的患者(n=29)相比。在多套数据集(n=90,100 个数据集)的逻辑模型中,转换能力和语义流畅性较差可以区分有和无 AVHs 的患者。
持续有 AVHs 的患者可能无法将注意力从声音上转移开;较差的语义流畅性可能是转换能力失败的次要缺陷。