Suppr超能文献

三种不同的自由形式可变形图像配准和轮廓传播方法对头颈部MRI的比较评估:以放疗期间腮腺变化为例

A Comparative Evaluation of 3 Different Free-Form Deformable Image Registration and Contour Propagation Methods for Head and Neck MRI: The Case of Parotid Changes During Radiotherapy.

作者信息

Broggi Sara, Scalco Elisa, Belli Maria Luisa, Logghe Gerlinde, Verellen Dirk, Moriconi Stefano, Chiara Anna, Palmisano Anna, Mellone Renata, Fiorino Claudio, Rizzo Giovanna

机构信息

1 Medical Physics Department, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

2 Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IBFM), CNR, Segrate, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jun;16(3):373-381. doi: 10.1177/1533034617691408. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate and compare the deformable image registration and parotid contour propagation process for head and neck magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated with radiotherapy using 3 different approaches-the commercial MIM, the open-source Elastix software, and an optimized version of it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with head and neck cancer previously treated with radiotherapy were considered. Deformable image registration and parotid contour propagation were evaluated by considering the magnetic resonance images acquired before and after the end of the treatment. Deformable image registration, based on free-form deformation method, and contour propagation available on MIM were compared to Elastix. Two different contour propagation approaches were implemented for Elastix software, a conventional one (DIR_Trx) and an optimized homemade version, based on mesh deformation (DIR_Mesh). The accuracy of these 3 approaches was estimated by comparing propagated to manual contours in terms of average symmetric distance, maximum symmetric distance, Dice similarity coefficient, sensitivity, and inclusiveness.

RESULTS

A good agreement was generally found between the manual contours and the propagated ones, without differences among the 3 methods; in few critical cases with complex deformations, DIR_Mesh proved to be more accurate, having the lowest values of average symmetric distance and maximum symmetric distance and the highest value of Dice similarity coefficient, although nonsignificant. The average propagation errors with respect to the reference contours are lower than the voxel diagonal (2 mm), and Dice similarity coefficient is around 0.8 for all 3 methods.

CONCLUSION

The 3 free-form deformation approaches were not significantly different in terms of deformable image registration accuracy and can be safely adopted for the registration and parotid contour propagation during radiotherapy on magnetic resonance imaging. More optimized approaches (as DIR_Mesh) could be preferable for critical deformations.

摘要

目的

使用三种不同方法——商业软件MIM、开源的Elastix软件及其优化版本,对接受放射治疗患者的头颈部磁共振成像的可变形图像配准和腮腺轮廓传播过程进行验证和比较。

材料与方法

纳入12例先前接受过放射治疗的头颈部癌患者。通过考虑治疗结束前后采集的磁共振图像来评估可变形图像配准和腮腺轮廓传播。将基于自由形式变形方法的可变形图像配准以及MIM上可用的轮廓传播与Elastix进行比较。针对Elastix软件实施了两种不同的轮廓传播方法,一种是传统方法(DIR_Trx),另一种是基于网格变形的优化自制版本(DIR_Mesh)。通过比较传播轮廓与手动轮廓在平均对称距离、最大对称距离、骰子相似系数、灵敏度和包容性方面的差异,来评估这三种方法的准确性。

结果

一般发现手动轮廓与传播轮廓之间具有良好的一致性,三种方法之间无差异;在少数具有复杂变形的关键病例中,DIR_Mesh被证明更准确,其平均对称距离和最大对称距离值最低,骰子相似系数值最高,尽管差异不显著。相对于参考轮廓的平均传播误差低于体素对角线(2毫米),并且三种方法的骰子相似系数均约为0.8。

结论

在可变形图像配准准确性方面,这三种自由形式变形方法没有显著差异,并且可以安全地用于磁共振成像放射治疗期间的配准和腮腺轮廓传播。对于关键变形,更优化的方法(如DIR_Mesh)可能更可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d6b/5616054/60f4ec2aaa37/10.1177_1533034617691408-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验