Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Departments of Pediatrics.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):e49-e54. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piw083.
The etiology of acute childhood diarrhea often eludes identification. We used a case-control study-stool archive to determine if nucleic acid tests for established and newly identified viruses diminish our previously published 32% rate of microbiologically unexplained episodes.
Using polymerase chain reaction, we sought to detect noroviruses GI and GII, classic and novel astroviruses, and human bocaviruses (HBoVs) 2, 3, and 4 among 178 case and 178 matched control stool samples and St. Louis and Malawi polyomaviruses among a subset of 98 case and control stool samples. We calculated adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals using conditional logistic regression.
Noroviruses were more common in cases (GI, 2.2%; GII, 16.9%) than in controls (GI, 0%; GII, 4.5%) (adjusted odds ratio, 5.2 [95% confidence interval, 2.5-11.3]). Astroviruses and HBoVs 2, 3, and 4 were overrepresented among the cases, although this difference was not statistically significant. Malawi polyomavirus was not associated with case status, and St. Louis polyomavirus was identified in only 1 subject (a control). When identified in cases, HBoVs 2, 3, and 4 were frequently (77%) found in conjunction with a bona fide diarrheagenic pathogen. Thirty-five (20%) case and 3 (2%) control stool samples contained more than 1 organism of interest. Overall, a bona fide or plausible pathogen was identified in 79% of the case stool samples. Preceding antibiotic use was more common among cases (adjusted odds ratio, 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 2.3-8.5]).
Noroviruses were found to cause one-third of the diarrhea cases that previously had no identified etiology. Future work should attempt to ascertain etiologic agents in the approximately one-fifth of cases without a plausible microbial cause, understand the significance of multiple agents in stools, and guide interpretation of nonculture diagnostics.
急性儿童腹泻的病因通常难以确定。我们采用病例对照研究-粪便档案,以确定核酸检测是否能降低我们之前发表的 32%微生物原因不明病例的比例。
我们使用聚合酶链反应检测了 178 例病例和 178 例匹配对照粪便样本中的诺如病毒 GI 和 GII、经典和新型星状病毒以及人博卡病毒(HBoV)2、3 和 4,以及 98 例病例和对照粪便样本中的圣路易斯和马拉维多瘤病毒。我们使用条件逻辑回归计算调整后的优势比和 95%置信区间。
病例组中诺如病毒(GI,2.2%;GII,16.9%)比对照组(GI,0%;GII,4.5%)更常见(调整后的优势比,5.2[95%置信区间,2.5-11.3])。星状病毒和 HBoV 2、3 和 4 在病例中也有较高的检出率,但差异无统计学意义。马拉维多瘤病毒与病例状态无关,圣路易斯多瘤病毒仅在 1 例(对照)中检出。在病例中检测到的 HBoV 2、3 和 4 常与真正的致泻病原体同时存在(77%)。35 例(20%)病例和 3 例(2%)对照粪便样本中含有超过 1 种感兴趣的病原体。总体而言,79%的病例粪便样本中确定了真正或合理的病原体。病例组中抗生素使用前史更为常见(调整后的优势比,4.5[95%置信区间,2.3-8.5])。
诺如病毒导致三分之一的先前病因不明的腹泻病例。未来的工作应尝试确定大约五分之一无合理微生物原因的病例中的病因,了解粪便中多种病原体的意义,并指导非培养诊断的解释。