• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1997 - 2010年美国关于室内空气清洁立法对各州吸烟率影响的14年纵向研究。

A 14-year longitudinal study of the impact of clean indoor air legislation on state smoking prevalence, USA, 1997-2010.

作者信息

Becker Craig M, Lee Joseph G L, Hudson Suzanne, Hoover Jeanne, Civils Donald

机构信息

Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:63-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.016
PMID:28188797
Abstract

While clean indoor air legislation at the state level is an evidence-based recommendation, only limited evidence exists regarding the impact of clean indoor air policies on state smoking prevalence. Using state smoking prevalence data from 1997 to 2010, a repeated measures observational analysis assessed the association between clean indoor air policies (i.e., workplace, restaurant, and bar) and state smoking prevalence while controlling for state cigarette taxes and year. The impacts from the number of previous years with any clean indoor air policy, the number of policies in effect during the current year, and the number of policies in effect the previous year were analyzed. Findings indicate a smoking prevalence predicted decrease of 0.13 percentage points (p=0.03) for each additional year one or more clean indoor air policies were in effect, a predicted decrease of 0.12 percentage points (p=0.09) for each policy in effect in the current year, and a predicted decrease of 0.22 percentage points (p=0.01) for each policy in effect in the previous year on the subsequent year. Clean indoor air policies show measurable associations with reductions in smoking prevalence within a year of implementation above and beyond taxes and time trends. Further efforts are needed to diffuse clean indoor air policies across states and provinces that have not yet adopted such policies.

摘要

虽然州一级的室内空气清洁立法是一项基于证据的建议,但关于室内空气清洁政策对州吸烟率的影响,现有证据有限。利用1997年至2010年的州吸烟率数据,一项重复测量观察性分析评估了室内空气清洁政策(即工作场所、餐厅和酒吧)与州吸烟率之间的关联,同时控制了州香烟税和年份。分析了此前实施过任何室内空气清洁政策的年份数量、当年实施的政策数量以及上一年实施的政策数量的影响。研究结果表明,每多实施一年一项或多项室内空气清洁政策,吸烟率预计下降0.13个百分点(p = 0.03);当年每实施一项政策,吸烟率预计下降0.12个百分点(p = 0.09);上一年每实施一项政策,次年吸烟率预计下降0.22个百分点(p = 0.01)。室内空气清洁政策在实施一年内与吸烟率降低之间存在可衡量的关联,这种关联超出了税收和时间趋势的影响。需要进一步努力,在尚未采用此类政策的州和省份推广室内空气清洁政策。

相似文献

1
A 14-year longitudinal study of the impact of clean indoor air legislation on state smoking prevalence, USA, 1997-2010.1997 - 2010年美国关于室内空气清洁立法对各州吸烟率影响的14年纵向研究。
Prev Med. 2017 Jun;99:63-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
2
Clean indoor air laws, cigarette excise taxes, and smoking: Results from the current population survey-tobacco use supplement, 2003-2011.室内空气清洁法规、香烟消费税和吸烟:2003-2011 年当前人口调查-烟草使用补充调查的结果。
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105744. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
3
Association of cigarette excise taxes and clean indoor air laws with change in smoking behavior in the United States: a Markov modeling analysis.美国香烟消费税和室内清洁空气法与吸烟行为变化的关联:一项马尔可夫模型分析
J Public Health Policy. 2024 Mar;45(1):100-113. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00458-x. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
4
Strength of clean indoor air laws and smoking related outcomes in the USA.美国清洁室内空气法的力度与吸烟相关后果
Tob Control. 2005 Feb;14(1):43-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.007880.
5
Effectiveness of Indiana's Statewide Smoke-Free Indoor Air Law in Reducing Prevalence of Adult Cigarette Smoking.印第安纳州全州无烟室内空气法降低成人吸烟率的效果。
J Prim Prev. 2020 Apr;41(2):87-103. doi: 10.1007/s10935-020-00579-z.
6
Effects of clean indoor air laws on bar and restaurant revenue in Minnesota cities.明尼苏达州各城市实施室内禁烟令对酒吧和餐馆收入的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Dec;39(6 Suppl 1):S10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.011.
7
The Effects of Workplace Clean Indoor Air Law Coverage on Workers' Smoking-Related Outcomes.工作场所清洁室内空气法覆盖范围对工人与吸烟相关结果的影响。
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26(2):226-242. doi: 10.1002/hec.3288. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
8
Association of state tobacco control policies with active smoking at the time of intervention for intermittent claudication.州级烟草控制政策与间歇性跛行干预时的主动吸烟之间的关联。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1759-1768.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.156. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
9
Economic effects of clean indoor air policies on bar and restaurant employment in Minneapolis and St Paul, Minnesota.明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市和圣保罗市清洁室内空气政策对酒吧和餐馆就业的经济影响。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):285-93. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c60ea9.
10
The economic impact of clean indoor air laws.清洁室内空气法的经济影响。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Nov-Dec;57(6):367-78. doi: 10.3322/CA.57.6.367.

引用本文的文献

1
Exposure to vaping and smoking prohibitions and nicotine and cannabis vaping in a California-based sample of young adults: An ecological momentary assessment study.加利福尼亚州年轻成年人样本中接触电子烟和吸烟禁令以及尼古丁和大麻电子烟的情况:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Addict Behav. 2025 Aug;167:108357. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108357. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.一项关于解决吸烟行为的人群层面干预措施的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2367-2391. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
3
Reactions to using other nicotine and tobacco products instead of menthol cigarettes: A qualitative study of people who smoke menthol cigarettes in the United States.
使用其他尼古丁和烟草产品替代薄荷醇香烟的反应:对美国吸薄荷醇香烟人群的定性研究
Prev Med Rep. 2023 May 6;34:102228. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102228. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Limited Improvements in Health Behaviors Suggest Need to Review Approaches to Health Promotion: A Repeated, Cross-Sectional Study.健康行为改善有限表明需要审视健康促进方法:一项重复横断面研究
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2020 Mar 1;16(4):521-526. doi: 10.1177/1559827620909378. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
5
Unboxed: US Young Adult Tobacco Users' Responses to a New Heated Tobacco Product.未封装:美国青年烟草使用者对新型加热烟草产品的反应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 3;17(21):8108. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218108.
6
Cigarette excise taxes, clean indoor air laws, and use of smoking cessation treatments: A mediation analysis.卷烟消费税、室内空气清洁法和使用戒烟治疗方法:中介分析。
Prev Med. 2020 Jul;136:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106098. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
7
Effectiveness of Indiana's Statewide Smoke-Free Indoor Air Law in Reducing Prevalence of Adult Cigarette Smoking.印第安纳州全州无烟室内空气法降低成人吸烟率的效果。
J Prim Prev. 2020 Apr;41(2):87-103. doi: 10.1007/s10935-020-00579-z.
8
Effects of stress on the development and progression of cardiovascular disease.压力对心血管疾病的发展和进展的影响。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):215-229. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.189. Epub 2017 Dec 7.