Suppr超能文献

用双标记水法测量冈比亚女性在农业活动高峰期的能量消耗。

Energy expenditure of Gambian women during peak agricultural activity measured by the doubly-labelled water method.

作者信息

Singh J, Prentice A M, Diaz E, Coward W A, Ashford J, Sawyer M, Whitehead R G

机构信息

MRC Dunn Nutrition Unit, Cambridge.

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 1989 Sep;62(2):315-29. doi: 10.1079/bjn19890033.

Abstract

The doubly-labelled water (2H218O) method was used to measure total energy expenditure (TEE) in ten non-pregnant, non-lactating (NPNL), six pregnant (P) and fourteen lactating (L) women in a rural Gambian community. Measurements were made on free-living subjects at a period of peak energetic stress when high agricultural work loads coincided with a hungary season to induce moderately severe negative energy balance. TEE averaged 10.42 (SD 2.08) MJ/d, equivalent to 1.95 (SD 0.38) times resting metabolic rate (RMR). The energy cost of physical activity plus thermogenesis, derived as TEE-RMR, averaged 4.94 (SD 1.96) MJ/d. Expressed per kg body-weight (103 kJ/kg per d) this component of expenditure was 2.5 times greater than comparative values from inactive, affluent women studied previously (39 kJ/kg per d). Estimated energy intake (EI) in a subset of the women (n 13) was only 4.80 (SD 1.58) MJ/d, yielding an apparent deficit of 6.08 MJ/d between EI and TEE. Weight changes suggested that endogenous fat oxidation accounted for only about 0.85 MJ/d, leaving an unexplained difference of over 5 MJ/d. Critical analysis of possible errors suggests that the new doubly-labelled water method has provided the most reliable estimates and that the estimates of EI were substantially in error. This finding has important consequences for other food intake studies.

摘要

采用双标水(2H218O)法,对冈比亚农村社区的10名非孕非哺乳期(NPNL)女性、6名孕期(P)女性和14名哺乳期(L)女性的总能量消耗(TEE)进行了测量。测量是在自由生活的受试者处于能量应激高峰期时进行的,此时高强度的农业工作负荷与饥饿季节同时出现,导致中度严重的负能量平衡。TEE平均为10.42(标准差2.08)兆焦耳/天,相当于静息代谢率(RMR)的1.95(标准差0.38)倍。通过TEE-RMR得出的身体活动加产热的能量消耗平均为4.94(标准差1.96)兆焦耳/天。按每千克体重计算(每天103千焦/千克),这部分能量消耗比之前研究的不活动、富裕女性的对比值(每天39千焦/千克)高出2.5倍。对部分女性(n = 13)的估计能量摄入量(EI)仅为4.80(标准差1.58)兆焦耳/天,导致EI与TEE之间明显相差6.08兆焦耳/天。体重变化表明,内源性脂肪氧化仅约占每天0.85兆焦耳,仍有超过5兆焦耳/天的差异无法解释。对可能误差的批判性分析表明,新的双标水法提供了最可靠的估计值,而EI的估计值存在重大误差。这一发现对其他食物摄入量研究具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验