• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interactions Between Knowledge and Testimony in Children's Reality-Status Judgments.儿童现实状态判断中知识与证言的相互作用
J Cogn Dev. 2016;17(3):486-504. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2015.1061529. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
2
Children's Use of Testimony to Determine Reality Status.
Child Dev. 2021 May;92(3):e317-e328. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13500. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
In the presence and absence of conflicting testimony, children's selective trust in the in-group informant in moral judgment and knowledge access.在有和没有相互矛盾证词的情况下,儿童在道德判断和知识获取方面对群体内信息提供者的选择性信任。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Jul;231:105664. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105664. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
4
Trust in testimony about strangers: young children prefer reliable informants who make positive attributions.对陌生人证词的信任:幼儿更喜欢做出积极归因的可靠信息提供者。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Mar;111(3):543-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
5
Never trust a stranger: Effects of explicit belief statements from strangers on children's reality status beliefs and beliefs about consensus.永远不要相信陌生人:陌生人明确的信念陈述对儿童现实状态信念和关于共识的信念的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2023 Jun;41(2):117-127. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12437. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
6
Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: children as naïve skeptics.重新审视幻想与现实的区别:天真的儿童是怀疑论者。
Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1496-510. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12081. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
7
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
8
The Effect of Realistic Contexts on Ontological Judgments of Novel Entities.现实情境对新实体本体判断的影响
Cogn Dev. 2015 Apr-Jun;34:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.010.
9
In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants.在没有相互矛盾的证词的情况下,幼儿会信任不准确的告密者。
Dev Sci. 2014 May;17(3):443-51. doi: 10.1111/desc.12134. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
10
The Roles of Intuition and Informants' Expertise in Children's Epistemic Trust.直觉与信息提供者的专业知识在儿童认知信任中的作用。
Child Dev. 2015 May-Jun;86(3):919-26. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12324. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of First-Hand Testimony and Hearsay on Children's Belief in the Improbable.第一手证言和传闻对儿童相信不可能事件的影响。
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):1133-1140. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12815. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
2
Wondering how: Children's and adults' explanations for mundane, improbable, and extraordinary events.想知道如何:儿童和成人对平凡、不可能和非凡事件的解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1586-1596. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1127-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Children's Use of Testimony to Determine Reality Status.
Child Dev. 2021 May;92(3):e317-e328. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13500. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Developing expectations regarding the boundaries of expertise.对专业知识的边界形成预期。
Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:215-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.013. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
3
The Roles of Intuition and Informants' Expertise in Children's Epistemic Trust.直觉与信息提供者的专业知识在儿童认知信任中的作用。
Child Dev. 2015 May-Jun;86(3):919-26. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12324. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
4
In the absence of conflicting testimony young children trust inaccurate informants.在没有相互矛盾的证词的情况下,幼儿会信任不准确的告密者。
Dev Sci. 2014 May;17(3):443-51. doi: 10.1111/desc.12134. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
5
Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: children as naïve skeptics.重新审视幻想与现实的区别:天真的儿童是怀疑论者。
Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1496-510. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12081. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
6
"He hasn't got the real toolkit!" Young children's reasoning about real/not-real status.“他没有真正的工具包!”幼儿对真实/非真实状态的推理。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Aug;49(8):1494-504. doi: 10.1037/a0030608. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
7
The development of children's ability to fill the gaps in their knowledge by consulting experts.儿童通过咨询专家来填补知识空白的能力的发展。
Child Dev. 2012 Jul-Aug;83(4):1368-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01782.x. Epub 2012 May 22.
8
Development of the use of conversational cues to assess reality status.运用对话线索评估现实状况的发展。
J Cogn Dev. 2011 Jan 1;12(4):537-555. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2011.554929.
9
Characterizing children's expectations about expertise and incompetence: halo or pitchfork effects?描述儿童对专业知识和不熟练的期望:光环效应还是叉状效应?
Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1634-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01618.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
10
Believing what you're told: young children's trust in unexpected testimony about the physical world.相信别人告诉你的:幼儿对有关物理世界的意外证言的信任。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Nov;61(3):248-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 22.

儿童现实状态判断中知识与证言的相互作用

Interactions Between Knowledge and Testimony in Children's Reality-Status Judgments.

作者信息

Lopez-Mobilia Gabriel, Woolley Jacqueline D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin.

出版信息

J Cogn Dev. 2016;17(3):486-504. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2015.1061529. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1080/15248372.2015.1061529
PMID:28190976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5300089/
Abstract

In two studies we attempt to capture the information processing abilities underlying children's reality-status judgments. Forty 5- to 6-year-olds and 53 7- to 8-year-olds heard about novel entities (animals) that varied in their fit with children's world knowledge. After hearing about each entity, children could either guess reality status immediately or listen to testimony first. Informants varied in their expertise and in their testimony, which either supported or refuted the entities' existence. Results revealed that children were able to evaluate the fit between the new information and their existing knowledge; this information then governed their decision regarding whether to seek testimony. Testimony had the strongest effect when new information did not conflict with, but was also not representative of, children's knowledge.

摘要

在两项研究中,我们试图获取儿童现实状态判断背后的信息处理能力。40名5至6岁儿童和53名7至8岁儿童听闻了一些与他们的世界知识契合度各异的新奇实体(动物)。在听闻每个实体后,孩子们既可以立即猜测其现实状态,也可以先听取证词。提供信息者的专业程度以及证词各不相同,这些证词有的支持、有的反驳实体的存在。结果显示,孩子们能够评估新信息与他们现有知识之间的契合度;这些信息随后决定了他们是否寻求证词。当新信息与儿童的知识既不冲突也不具有代表性时,证词的影响最为强烈。