Yao Dezhong
Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, Center for Information in Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Brain Topogr. 2017 Mar;30(2):161-171. doi: 10.1007/s10548-016-0543-x. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
Currently, average reference is one of the most widely adopted references in EEG and ERP studies. The theoretical assumption is the surface potential integral of a volume conductor being zero, thus the average of scalp potential recordings might be an approximation of the theoretically desired zero reference. However, such a zero integral assumption has been proved only for a spherical surface. In this short communication, three counter-examples are given to show that the potential integral over the surface of a dipole in a volume conductor may not be zero. It depends on the shape of the conductor and the orientation of the dipole. This fact on one side means that average reference is not a theoretical 'gold standard' reference, and on the other side reminds us that the practical accuracy of average reference is not only determined by the well-known electrode array density and its coverage but also intrinsically by the head shape. It means that reference selection still is a fundamental problem to be fixed in various EEG and ERP studies.
目前,平均参考电极是脑电图(EEG)和事件相关电位(ERP)研究中应用最为广泛的参考电极之一。其理论假设是容积导体的表面电位积分为零,因此头皮电位记录的平均值可能是理论上所需零参考电极的近似值。然而,这种零积分假设仅在球形表面得到证明。在本简短通讯中,给出了三个反例,以表明容积导体中偶极子表面的电位积分可能不为零。这取决于导体的形状和偶极子的方向。这一事实一方面意味着平均参考电极并非理论上的“金标准”参考电极,另一方面提醒我们,平均参考电极的实际准确性不仅取决于众所周知的电极阵列密度及其覆盖范围,还本质上取决于头部形状。这意味着在各种脑电图和事件相关电位研究中,参考电极的选择仍然是一个有待解决的基本问题。