• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习原理可改善髋部骨折预测。

Machine Learning Principles Can Improve Hip Fracture Prediction.

作者信息

Kruse Christian, Eiken Pia, Vestergaard Peter

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Moelleparkvej 4, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Calcif Tissue Int. 2017 Apr;100(4):348-360. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0238-7. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00223-017-0238-7
PMID:28197643
Abstract

Apply machine learning principles to predict hip fractures and estimate predictor importance in Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scanned men and women. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data from two Danish regions between 1996 and 2006 were combined with national Danish patient data to comprise 4722 women and 717 men with 5 years of follow-up time (original cohort n = 6606 men and women). Twenty-four statistical models were built on 75% of data points through k-5, 5-repeat cross-validation, and then validated on the remaining 25% of data points to calculate area under the curve (AUC) and calibrate probability estimates. The best models were retrained with restricted predictor subsets to estimate the best subsets. For women, bootstrap aggregated flexible discriminant analysis ("bagFDA") performed best with a test AUC of 0.92 [0.89; 0.94] and well-calibrated probabilities following Naïve Bayes adjustments. A "bagFDA" model limited to 11 predictors (among them bone mineral densities (BMD), biochemical glucose measurements, general practitioner and dentist use) achieved a test AUC of 0.91 [0.88; 0.93]. For men, eXtreme Gradient Boosting ("xgbTree") performed best with a test AUC of 0.89 [0.82; 0.95], but with poor calibration in higher probabilities. A ten predictor subset (BMD, biochemical cholesterol and liver function tests, penicillin use and osteoarthritis diagnoses) achieved a test AUC of 0.86 [0.78; 0.94] using an "xgbTree" model. Machine learning can improve hip fracture prediction beyond logistic regression using ensemble models. Compiling data from international cohorts of longer follow-up and performing similar machine learning procedures has the potential to further improve discrimination and calibration.

摘要

应用机器学习原理预测髋部骨折,并评估双能X线吸收法(DXA)扫描的男性和女性中预测因素的重要性。将1996年至2006年丹麦两个地区的双能X线吸收法数据与丹麦国家患者数据相结合,纳入4722名女性和717名男性,随访时间为5年(原始队列中男性和女性共6606名)。通过k-5、5次重复交叉验证,基于75%的数据点构建了24个统计模型,然后在其余25%的数据点上进行验证,以计算曲线下面积(AUC)并校准概率估计。使用受限预测变量子集对最佳模型进行重新训练,以估计最佳子集。对于女性,自助聚合灵活判别分析(“bagFDA”)表现最佳,测试AUC为0.92[0.89;0.94],经朴素贝叶斯调整后概率校准良好。一个限于11个预测因素(包括骨密度(BMD)、生化血糖测量、全科医生和牙医使用情况)的“bagFDA”模型,测试AUC为0.91[0.88;0.93]。对于男性,极端梯度提升(“xgbTree”)表现最佳,测试AUC为0.89[0.82;0.95],但高概率下校准较差。使用“xgbTree”模型,一个包含10个预测因素的子集(BMD、生化胆固醇和肝功能测试、青霉素使用情况和骨关节炎诊断)的测试AUC为0.86[0.78;0.94]。机器学习可以使用集成模型在逻辑回归之外改善髋部骨折预测。汇集来自随访时间更长的国际队列的数据并执行类似的机器学习程序,有可能进一步提高判别力和校准。

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Principles Can Improve Hip Fracture Prediction.机器学习原理可改善髋部骨折预测。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2017 Apr;100(4):348-360. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0238-7. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
2
Digital X-ray radiogrammetry in the study of osteoporotic fractures: Comparison to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX.数字X线摄影测量法在骨质疏松性骨折研究中的应用:与双能X线吸收法及FRAX的比较
Bone. 2016 May;86:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
3
Machine Learning Can Improve Clinical Detection of Low BMD: The DXA-HIP Study.机器学习可提高低骨密度的临床检出率:DXA-HIP 研究。
J Clin Densitom. 2021 Oct-Dec;24(4):527-537. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.西班牙FRAX模型在预测骨质疏松性骨折决策中的原理:西班牙女性FRIDEX队列的更新
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 17;17:262. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1096-6.
5
Fracture prediction from repeat BMD measurements in clinical practice.临床实践中通过重复骨密度测量进行骨折预测。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jan;27(1):203-10. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3259-y. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
6
Sarcopenia combined with FRAX probabilities improves fracture risk prediction in older Chinese men.肌少症合并 FRAX 概率可提高中国老年男性骨折风险预测。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Dec;15(12):918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
7
The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.双能X线吸收法、跟骨定量超声以及骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®和骨质疏松风险评估仪)在识别桡骨远端或髋部骨折女性中的应用:一项初步研究。
Endocr Res. 2016 Aug;41(3):248-60. doi: 10.3109/07435800.2015.1120744. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.一种用于预测髋部骨折事件发生的简化髋部结构分析方法的评估
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jan;27(1):241-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3282-z. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Random field assessment of inhomogeneous bone mineral density from DXA scans can enhance the differentiation between postmenopausal women with and without hip fractures.通过双能X线吸收法(DXA)扫描对不均匀骨密度进行随机场评估,可以增强区分有和没有髋部骨折的绝经后女性的能力。
J Biomech. 2015 Apr 13;48(6):1043-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.030. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
Fracture risk prediction using phalangeal bone mineral density or FRAX(®)?-A Danish cohort study on men and women.使用指骨骨密度或 FRAX(®)预测骨折风险-丹麦男女队列研究。
J Clin Densitom. 2014 Jan-Mar;17(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Duration of Hospitalization for Hip Arthroplasty: Influence of Clinical-Biological Factors and Timing of the Intervention.髋关节置换术的住院时间:临床生物学因素及干预时机的影响
Cureus. 2025 May 11;17(5):e83876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83876. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Applications of machine learning and deep learning in musculoskeletal medicine: a narrative review.机器学习和深度学习在肌肉骨骼医学中的应用:一篇叙述性综述。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 15;30(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02511-9.
3
Accuracy of artificial intelligence in prediction of osteoporotic fractures in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool: A systematic review.
与双能X线吸收法和骨折风险评估工具相比,人工智能预测骨质疏松性骨折的准确性:一项系统评价。
World J Orthop. 2025 Apr 18;16(4):103572. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i4.103572.
4
Prevention of Osteoporosis in SAMP6 Mice by Rikkunshi-To: Japanese Kampo Medicine.六君子汤对SAMP6小鼠骨质疏松症的预防作用:日本汉方医学
Life (Basel). 2025 Mar 29;15(4):557. doi: 10.3390/life15040557.
5
[Development of prognostic clinical and genetic models of the risk of low bone mineral density using neural network training].[使用神经网络训练开发低骨密度风险的预后临床和遗传模型]
Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 2024 Jan 24;70(6):67-82. doi: 10.14341/probl13421.
6
An electronic health record (EHR)-based risk calculator can predict fractures comparably to FRAX: a proof-of-concept study.基于电子健康记录(EHR)的风险计算器可与 FRAX 相当预测骨折:概念验证研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Dec;35(12):2117-2126. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07221-2. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
7
Artificial intelligence in fracture detection with different image modalities and data types: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同图像模态和数据类型在骨折检测中的人工智能:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jan 30;3(1):e0000438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000438. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
[Application and prospect of machine learning in orthopaedic trauma].[机器学习在骨科创伤中的应用与前景]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 15;37(12):1562-1568. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202308064.
9
AI algorithms for accurate prediction of osteoporotic fractures in patients with diabetes: an up-to-date review.人工智能算法在预测糖尿病患者骨质疏松性骨折中的应用:最新综述。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 12;18(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04446-5.
10
Predictive value of machine learning on fracture risk in osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习在骨质疏松性骨折风险预测中的价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 9;13(12):e071430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071430.