Suppr超能文献

同伴及患者反馈以提高术后阿片类药物处方指南的依从性:一项阶梯楔形整群随机临床试验

Peer and Patient Feedback to Increase Adherence to Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Guidelines: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Agarwal Anish K, Ebert Jeffrey P, Xiong Ruiying, Ali Zarina S, Lee Daniel, Shofer Frances, Gitelman Yevgeniy, Do David, Spencer Evan A, Grenader E Madeline, Li Fan, Harhay Michael O, Delgado M Kit

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Center for Health Care Transformation and Innovation, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1672.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Prescribing more opioids than patients need following surgery is associated with long-term use, misuse, and diversion. Interventions are needed to increase adherence to procedure-specific guidelines while preserving the ability to manage pain.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether providing clinicians monthly feedback with peer comparisons and patient-reported outcomes would increase adherence to postoperative opioid prescribing guidelines.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted at 6 surgical departments or divisions caring for patients undergoing 30 high-volume surgical procedures in a 5-hospital academic health system in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Surgical clinicians (attending surgeons, advanced practice professionals, and resident physicians) with 5 or more opioid prescriptions per month for eligible procedures during a 3-month period at baseline were eligible for inclusion. Six clinician clusters were randomly assigned to the intervention in 3 steps offset by 2 months. Each step included a 9-month baseline, a 6-month intervention, and a 6-month follow-up. The first step of the intervention began on June 8, 2022. Follow-up concluded in October 2023, and data analysis was performed from November 2023 to April 2024.

INTERVENTION

Clinicians were emailed a report on their most frequently performed procedures, which contained a figure of the following mean numbers: pills prescribed relative to guidelines, pills peer clinicians prescribed, and pills patients reported using after a procedure; an additional figure displayed patients' self-reported ability to manage pain. Monthly reports included prescribing trends, peer comparison feedback, and reminders about how many pills patients take and how well patients reported pain management with guideline-adherent prescriptions.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of guideline-adherent opioid prescriptions; secondary outcomes included patient-reported ability to manage pain (measured on a 0 to 10 scale, with 0 being not at all able), pain score, pills prescribed, pills leftover, and refill rate.

RESULTS

A total of 143 surgical clinicians treating 20 557 patients were included (10 069 at baseline, 5382 during the intervention, and 5106 at follow-up). Mean (SD) patient age was 57.0 (15.7) years, and 10 996 patients (53.5%) were female. The baseline guideline adherence rate was 57.2%. During the intervention, adherence increased to 71.8%, with an adjusted intervention effect of 5.3% (95% CI, 2.0%-8.7%). The impact of the intervention increased over time, and adherence remained above baseline at follow-up (74.4%). The largest change was noted for orthopedic procedures of knee, hip, and shoulder arthroplasty. Patient-reported pain and ability to manage pain were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial, a feedback intervention using peer comparisons and patient-reported data increased opioid guideline adherence without compromising patients' ability to manage pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05358522.

摘要

重要性

术后开具超出患者所需剂量的阿片类药物与长期使用、滥用及药物转移有关。需要采取干预措施来提高对特定手术指南的遵循度,同时保留管理疼痛的能力。

目的

测试向临床医生提供每月一次的同行比较反馈及患者报告的结果是否会提高对术后阿片类药物处方指南的遵循度。

设计、地点和参与者:这项阶梯式楔形整群随机临床试验在宾夕法尼亚州和新泽西州的一个由5家医院组成的学术医疗系统中的6个外科科室或部门进行,这些科室负责为接受30种高流量手术的患者提供护理。在基线期的3个月内,每月有5张或更多符合条件手术的阿片类药物处方的外科临床医生(主治外科医生、高级执业专业人员和住院医师)符合纳入条件。6个临床医生群组被随机分为3个阶段进行干预,每个阶段间隔2个月。每个阶段包括9个月的基线期、6个月的干预期和6个月的随访期。干预的第一阶段于2022年6月8日开始。随访于2023年10月结束,数据分析于2023年11月至2024年4月进行。

干预措施

通过电子邮件向临床医生发送一份关于他们最常开展手术的报告,其中包含以下平均数的图表:相对于指南开具的药丸数量、同行临床医生开具的药丸数量以及患者报告术后使用的药丸数量;另一个图表展示患者自我报告的疼痛管理能力。月度报告包括处方趋势、同行比较反馈以及关于患者服用药丸数量和患者报告的遵循指南处方的疼痛管理效果的提醒。

主要结局和指标

主要结局是遵循指南的阿片类药物处方比例;次要结局包括患者报告的疼痛管理能力(采用0至10分制,0分表示完全没有能力)、疼痛评分、开具的药丸数量、剩余药丸数量和再填充率。

结果

共纳入143名治疗20557名患者的外科临床医生(基线期10069名,干预期5382名,随访期5106名)。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为57.0(15.7)岁,10996名患者(53.5%)为女性。基线期指南遵循率为57.2%。在干预期,遵循率提高到71.8%,调整后的干预效果为5.3%(95%置信区间,2.0% - 8.7%)。干预的影响随时间增加,随访期的遵循率仍高于基线期(74.4%)。膝关节、髋关节和肩关节置换术等骨科手术的变化最为显著。患者报告的疼痛和疼痛管理能力未发生改变。

结论与意义

在这项阶梯式楔形整群随机临床试验中,使用同行比较和患者报告数据的反馈干预提高了阿片类药物指南的遵循度,且未损害患者管理疼痛的能力。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05358522。

相似文献

6
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.

本文引用的文献

6
When peer comparison information harms physician well-being.当同行比较信息损害医生的福祉时。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 19;119(29):e2121730119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121730119. Epub 2022 Jul 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验