Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA.
Biol Sex Differ. 2017 Feb 9;8:7. doi: 10.1186/s13293-016-0125-3. eCollection 2017.
Females are markedly underinvestigated in the biological and behavioral sciences due to the presumption that cyclic hormonal changes across the ovulatory cycle introduce excess variability to measures of interest in comparison to males. However, recent analyses indicate that male and female mice and rats exhibit comparable variability across numerous physiological and behavioral measures, even when the stage of the estrous cycle is not considered. Hormonal changes across the ovulatory cycle likely contribute cyclic, intra-individual variability in females, but the source(s) of male variability has, to our knowledge, not been investigated. It is unclear whether male variability, like that of females, is temporally structured and, therefore, quantifiable and predictable. Finally, whether males and females exhibit variability on similar time scales has not been explored.
These questions were addressed by collecting chronic, high temporal resolution locomotor activity (LA) and core body temperature (CBT) data from male and female BALB/c mice.
Contrary to expectation, males are more variable than females over the course of the day (diel variability) and exhibit higher intra-individual daily range than females in both LA and CBT. Between mice of a given sex, variability is comparable for LA but the inter-individual daily range in CBT is greater for males. To identify potential rhythmic processes contributing to these sex differences, we employed wavelet transformations across a range of periodicities (1-39 h).
Although variability in circadian power is comparable between the sexes for both LA and CBT, infradian variability is greater in females and ultradian variability is greater in males. Thus, exclusion of female mice from studies because of estrous cycle variability may increase variance in investigations where only male measures are collected over a span of several hours and limit generalization of findings from males to females.
由于循环激素变化会在排卵周期中引入额外的可变性,与男性相比,对女性的生物学和行为科学的研究明显不足。然而,最近的分析表明,即使不考虑发情周期的阶段,雄性和雌性小鼠和大鼠在许多生理和行为测量中表现出可比的可变性。排卵周期中的激素变化可能会导致女性的周期性个体内可变性,但男性可变性的来源,据我们所知,尚未得到研究。目前尚不清楚男性的可变性是否像女性一样具有时间结构,因此是否可以量化和预测。最后,男性和女性是否表现出相似的时间尺度的可变性尚未得到探索。
通过收集雄性和雌性 BALB/c 小鼠的慢性、高时间分辨率的运动活动 (LA) 和核心体温 (CBT) 数据来解决这些问题。
与预期相反,雄性在一天中的变化比雌性更大(日变异性),并且在 LA 和 CBT 中都表现出比雌性更高的个体内每日范围。在给定性别的小鼠中,LA 的可变性具有可比性,但 CBT 的个体内每日范围在雄性中更大。为了确定潜在的节律过程对这些性别差异的贡献,我们在一系列周期(1-39 小时)内使用了小波变换。
尽管 LA 和 CBT 的昼夜节律功率变化在性别之间具有可比性,但女性的 infradian 变异性更大,男性的 ultradian 变异性更大。因此,由于发情周期的变异性而排除雌性小鼠进行研究可能会增加仅在数小时内收集雄性测量值的研究中的方差,并限制从雄性到雌性的发现的推广。